Advanix™ Biliary M00534200Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Biliary Stent with NaviflexTM RX Delivery System · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Advanix Biliary (59)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729787297), received between Oct 16, 2019 and Jan 28, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Break2
- Migration2
- Defective Device1
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Positioning Failure1
- Positioning Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Unspecified Infection2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 28, 2026Break; Use of Device Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NOTE: RELATED AXIOS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED UNDER RECORD (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WITH NAVIFLEX DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS TO BE IMPLANTED TO TREAT STONES DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2026. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE FIRST STENT; HOWEVER, THE INNER GUIDE CATHETER COMPLETELY BROKE APART. THE DEVICE SEPARATED INTO TWO OR MORE PIECES. THE PHYSICIAN THEN USED FORCEPS TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PIECES OF THE GUIDE CATHETER. A SECOND DEVICE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY USED, AND THE DEPLOYMENT CATHETER ALSO BROKE. IN THIS INSTANCE, THE DEVICE DID NOT SEPARATE INTO TWO OR MORE PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE PROCEDURE. NOTE: USERS ARE STRONGLY ADVISED BY THE DFU NOT TO USE A STENT PAST THE EXPIRATION DATE ON THE PACKAGE INSERT. HOWEVER, THE DEVICES ARE TESTED BEYOND THE EXPIRATION DATE ON THE PACKAGE AND PER MEDICAL SAFETY; THE ADDITIONAL REASONABLY EXPECTED RISK OF THE USE OF THIS EXPIRED PRODUCT IS MINIMAL.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24199352 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2024Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX RX BILIARY STENT WITH NAVIFLEX DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS TO BE USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT FOR DRAINAGE DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE STENT WAS UNABLE TO BE DEPLOYED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20853362 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2022Break; Positioning Problem; Break; Positioning Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS USED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY WITH BILIARY STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED THE STENT, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE GUIDE CATHETER SEEMED TO GET STUCK INTO THE STENT AND BROKE OFF WITH A PIECE OF THE BROKEN GUIDE CATHETER LODGED INTO THE DEPLOYED STENT. THE BROKEN GUIDE CATHETER WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH A RAT TOOTH GRASPING FORCEPS AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14332412 ↗MalfunctionApr 20, 2022Defective Device; Migration; Defective Device; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS USED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. THE ANATOMY LOCATION WAS NOT REPORTED. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT HAS FAILURE MODES OF BENT OR KINKED, DIFFICULT OR FAILED TO DEPLOY, BREAK OR FRACTURED. ADDITIONALLY, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT HAD A MIGRATION ISSUES . THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER ADVANIX BILIARY STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC HAS BEEN UNABLE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT TO DATE, DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14155440 ↗MalfunctionApr 1, 2022Difficult to Remove; Migration; Difficult to Remove; Migration
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. DURING A PLANNED STENT REMOVAL, THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THAT THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT HAD MIGRATED PROXIMALLY IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THEY WERE NOT ABLE TO REMOVE THE MIGRATED ADVANIX BILIARY STENT SUCCESSFULLY AND THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO A DIFFERENT HOSPITAL. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13978770 ↗InjuryJul 7, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE. POST PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD ACQUIRED INFECTION. A STENT REMOVAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN FOUND WHITE SECRETIONS COMING OUT FROM THE DUCT. THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. MEDICATION FOR INFECTION WAS PRESCRIBED TO THE PATIENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE "FULLY RECOVERED".
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12127465 ↗InjuryJul 6, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE. POST PROCEDURE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD ACQUIRED INFECTION. A STENT REMOVAL PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED. THE EVENT DATE WAS NOT REPORTED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN FOUND A WHITE SECRETIONS COMING OUT FROM THE DUCT. THE ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. MEDICATION FOR INFECTION WERE PRESCRIBED TO THE PATENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE "FULLY RECOVERED". THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 12125844 ↗MalfunctionSep 14, 2020Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS USED DURING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THEY ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE STENT, SEVERE RESISTANCE WAS MET. WHEN THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED, A FOREIGN OBJECT FOUND HANGING FROM THE STENT, HOWEVER, THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED ON THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10529363 ↗MalfunctionOct 16, 2019Unsealed Device Packaging; Unsealed Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX BILIARY STENT WAS TO BE USED IN A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING UNPACKING, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE PACKAGING OF ADVANIX BILIARY STENT HAD A HOLE AND THE STERILITY OF THE DEVICE WAS COMPROMISED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER ADVANIX BILIARY STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9199615 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page