Skip to content

Extractor™ Pro XL M00547150Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Retrieval Balloon Catheter · Class 2

All models of Extractor Pro XL (5)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729790372), received between Feb 26, 2019 and Sep 16, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Deflate” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Deflate4
  • Deflation Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 16, 2024Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED IN THE BILE DUCT DURING A BILE DUCT STONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE. THE EXACT PROCEDURE DATE IS UNKNOWN. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEFLATION WAS SLOW. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20232545 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2024Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC BILE DUCT STONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THIS DEVICE WAS USED, A PROBLEM OCCURRED WHERE INFLATION OF THE BALLOON WAS ABLE TO BE PERFORMED BUT DEFLATION WAS DIFFICULT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18988453 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 25, 2023Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT FOR A BILIARY LITHOTOMY FOR GALLSTONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON JANUARY 05, 2023. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS ABLE TO BE INFLATED BUT THE BALLOON COULD NOT DEFLATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16240332 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2023Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT (CBD) DURING A GALLSTONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON COULD BE INFLATED; HOWEVER, IT WOULD NOT DEFLATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16152745 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2019Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE BILE DUCT DURING A BILIARY STONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON COULD NOT BE DEFLATED, WHICH CAUSED DIFFICULTY WHEN WITHDRAWING THE CATHETER THROUGH THE ENDOSCOPE. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY TOGETHER WITH THE ENDOSCOPE. THE PHYSICIAN THEN CUT THE CATHETER WITH SCISSORS AT THE PART WHICH WAS PROTRUDING FROM THE TIP OF THE ENDOSCOPE AND THE BALLOON WAS FOUND TO BE DEFLATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8369915 ↗

Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page