Extractor™ Pro XL M00547150Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Retrieval Balloon Catheter · Class 2
All models of Extractor Pro XL (5)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729790372), received between Feb 26, 2019 and Sep 16, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Deflate” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Deflate4
- Deflation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 16, 2024Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE USED IN THE BILE DUCT DURING A BILE DUCT STONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE. THE EXACT PROCEDURE DATE IS UNKNOWN. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DEFLATION WAS SLOW. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20232545 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2024Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC BILE DUCT STONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN THIS DEVICE WAS USED, A PROBLEM OCCURRED WHERE INFLATION OF THE BALLOON WAS ABLE TO BE PERFORMED BUT DEFLATION WAS DIFFICULT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18988453 ↗MalfunctionJan 25, 2023Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT FOR A BILIARY LITHOTOMY FOR GALLSTONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON JANUARY 05, 2023. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS ABLE TO BE INFLATED BUT THE BALLOON COULD NOT DEFLATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16240332 ↗MalfunctionJan 12, 2023Failure to Deflate; Failure to Deflate
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT (CBD) DURING A GALLSTONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2022. DURING THE PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE BALLOON COULD BE INFLATED; HOWEVER, IT WOULD NOT DEFLATE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16152745 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2019Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON WAS USED IN THE BILE DUCT DURING A BILIARY STONE REMOVAL PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON COULD NOT BE DEFLATED, WHICH CAUSED DIFFICULTY WHEN WITHDRAWING THE CATHETER THROUGH THE ENDOSCOPE. REPORTEDLY, THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY TOGETHER WITH THE ENDOSCOPE. THE PHYSICIAN THEN CUT THE CATHETER WITH SCISSORS AT THE PART WHICH WAS PROTRUDING FROM THE TIP OF THE ENDOSCOPE AND THE BALLOON WAS FOUND TO BE DEFLATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER EXTRACTOR PRO XL RETRIEVAL BALLOON. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8369915 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page