WallFlex™ Biliary Transhepatic M00574720Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Stent System · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729799368), received between May 20, 2026 and May 20, 2026 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Failure to Advance1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 20, 2026Failure to Advance; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTERVENTION WAS REQUIRED. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A LARGE PANCREATIC TUMOR WITH A TORTUOUS, TIGHTLY STENOSED BILIARY TREE. A 10MMX40MM WALLFLEX BILIARY TRANSHEPATIC STENT WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT VIA TRANS BILIARY APPROACH. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE LESION WAS NOT PRE-DILATED AND DIFFICULTY CROSSING THE LESION WAS NOTED. DURING STENT DEPLOYMENT, DIFFICULTY WAS NOTED AND THE STENT DEPLOYED WITH LESS THAN 1CM OUT OF THE SHEATH, AND THE MAJORITY OF THE STENT REMAINING WITHIN THE SHEATH. THE STENT WAS RECAPTURED, AND BOTH THE SHEATH AND DELIVERY SYSTEM WERE REMOVED AS A SYSTEM. THE PATIENT WAS MOVED TO GASTROENTEROLOGY (GI) TO ATTEMPT STENT PLACEMENT; HOWEVER, THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS PROLONGED. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CANCELLED, AND A DRAINAGE CATHETER WAS PLACED FOR PALLIATIVE PURPOSES AND THE PROCEDURE WAS RESCHEDULED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25236187 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page