Charger™ H74939206040410Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Charger (49)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729804109), received between Jan 8, 2019 and Jan 8, 2019 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 8, 2019Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN TWO DIFFERENT VESSEL LOCATED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND TIBIAL PERONEAL TRUNK. A 4.0MM X 40MM X 135CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED IN THE SFA, BUT THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH A 3MM X 40MM X 145CM COYOTE ES BALLOON CATHETER AND IT WORKED OKAY. THEN THEY WORKED ON A LOWER VESSEL THAT WAS MEASURED VIA INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND. A 3MM X 40MM X 145CM AND 2MM X 40MM X 144CM COYOTE ES BALLOON CATHETERS WERE ADVANCED IN THE TIBIAL PERONEAL TRUNK BUT ALSO RUPTURED. THE BALLOON CATHETERS WERE REMOVED AND THEY TRIED INFLATING THEM OUTSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS AN INCISION THAT IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS POKED THROUGH. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A HALF SIZE UP OR HALF SIZE DOWN FROM THE THIRD BALLOON CATHETER. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8226577 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page