Charger™ H74939206070670Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Charger (49)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729804543), received between Mar 28, 2022 and Dec 11, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture4
- Burst Container or Vessel1
- Inflation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 11, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE IS A HOLE IN THE BALLOON OCCURRED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT PERCUTANEOUS BALLOON DILATION OF AN ARTIFICIAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA IN THE LEFT FOREARM, ALONG WITH THROMBOLYSIS OF THE UPPER LIMB VEIN, PERFORMED UNDER LOCAL ANESTHESIA. A 7.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED, AND IMAGING REVEALED ABNORMALITIES. UPON REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT AND FLUSHING WITH HEPARINIZED SALINE, A VISIBLE DEFECT WAS IDENTIFIED ON THE BALLOON. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLAICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20901274 ↗MalfunctionMay 22, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE MILDLY TORTUOUS AND SEVERELY CALCIFIED RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. A 7.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. IT WAS NOT USED TO POST-DILATE A PREVIOUSLY PLACED STENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, ON THE FIRST INFLATION PRIOR TO REACHING NOMINAL ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE FOR SECONDS, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITH NO FRAGMENTS LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT AND WAS REPLACED FOR ANOTHER OF THE SAME MODEL TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19378280 ↗MalfunctionFeb 8, 2023Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 70% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN A MODERATELY TORTUOUS AND MODERATELY CALCIFIED FISTULA. A 7.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. BURST ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE WAS 18. HOWEVER, DURING THE THIRD INFLATION AT 14 ATMOSPHERES, THE BALLOON BURSTS. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED INTACT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER BALLOON CATHETER. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16321681 ↗MalfunctionJan 20, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Inflation Problem
BALLOON BURST DURING PROCEDURE. BURST ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE WAS 18, BALLOON BURST AT 14. THIS WAS THE THIRD INFLATION WITH THIS BALLOON AND BURST ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE WAS NEVER REACHED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16226550 ↗MalfunctionMar 28, 2022Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE 90% STENOSED TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN MILDLY TORTUOUS AND MILDLY CALCIFIED SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. A 7.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE INITIAL INFLATION AT 3 ATMOSPHERES, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED IN A DEFLATED STATE WITH NO INTERVENTION REQUIRED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS NOR INJURIES REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13926190 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page