Charger™ H74939206080410Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Charger (49)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729804666), received between Mar 25, 2019 and Feb 2, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture4
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 2, 2026Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. VASCULAR ACCESS WAS OBTAINED UNDER B-ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE, AND AN 8.0 X 40, 135 CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED TO PERFORM THE FENESTRATION PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED BEFORE THE RATED BURST PRESSURE WAS REACHED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24240859 ↗MalfunctionNov 21, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON BURST OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE PERIPHERAL ARTERY. AN 8.0 X40, 135CM CHARGER WAS SELECTED FOR USE IN ANGIOPLASTY. HOWEVER, DURING INFLATION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BALLOON BURST. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23622840 ↗MalfunctionJan 9, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE THORACIC AORTA. AN 8.0 X40, 135CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A NEW BALLOON. NO COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED, AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18476513 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CONTAMINATION AND BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. A 6X60X120 EPIC VASCULAR STENT WAS SELECTED FOR USE. HOWEVER, DURING PREPARATION, THE STENT WAS CONTAMINATED BY TECHNOLOGIST. ANOTHER EPIC STENT OF AN UNKNOWN SIZE WAS SUCCESSFULLY USED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE ILIAC ARTERY. AFTER AN UNKNOWN EPIC STENT WAS DEPLOYED, A 8.0 X40, 135CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING INFLATION AT NOMINAL PRESSURE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT'S BODY AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9848396 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2019Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE POPLITEAL VEIN. A 8.0 X40, 135CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS WAS SELECTED TO DILATE THE LESION. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED THREE TIMES, BETWEEN 8 AND 10 ATMOSPHERES EACH TIME. THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO WITHDRAW THE BALLOON OUT OF THE 6FR SHORT NON-BSC SHEATH BUT THE BALLOON WOULD NOT COME OUT. THE PHYSICIAN CONTINUED TO PULL ON IT AND THE BALLOON DETACHED FROM THE SHAFT INSIDE THE SHEATH. THE SHEATH WAS REMOVED WHICH HAD THE DETACHED BALLOON STUCK IN IT AND EVERYTHING WAS REMOVED TOGETHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8449846 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page