Charger™ H74939206080670Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Charger (49)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729804680), received between Oct 2, 2018 and Aug 28, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture5
- Detachment of Device or Device Component2
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient3
- Foreign Body In Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 28, 2024Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED AFTER THE BALLOON RUPTURED. AN 8.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR TREATMENT. POST-DILATION, AT 20 ATMOSPHERES, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE MATERIAL WAS FRAGMENTED AND SHEARED OFF OF THE CATHETER. THE PHYSICIAN PERFORMED SNARING IN AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE THE REMAINING MATERIAL BUT WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE PHYSICIAN PLACED A NON-BSC SELF-EXPANDING STENT GRAFT TO TRAP THE BALLOON FRAGMENT BETWEEN THE GRAFT AND THE LUMEN AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS REPORTED, AND PATIENT WAS EXPECTED TO FULLY RECOVER.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 20091340 ↗InjuryApr 25, 2023Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Rupture; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE AND DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN AN ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA. AN 8.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE FIRST INFLATION, THE BALLOON MATERIAL BURST, DETACHED, AND MOVED TO THE PROXIMAL END OF THE CATHETER. WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PULL THE DEVICE THOUGH THE SHEATH, THE BALLOON MATERIAL DETACHED AND REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. TO PREVENT FROM FURTHER POSSIBLE MIGRATION, A STENT WAS PLACED OVER THE UNRETRIEVED BALLOON MATERIAL AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AND THE PATIENT FULLY RECOVERED. THE PATIENT WILL UNDERGO A FISTULA REVISION AND THE UNRETRIEVED BALLOON MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED BY THEN.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16812465 ↗MalfunctionAug 13, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE ILIAC ARTERY. A 8.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT NOMINAL PRESSURE, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT ANY HARM TO THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10400796 ↗MalfunctionOct 12, 2018Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT BALLOON RUPTURE OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE LEFT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. A 8.0 X60, 75CM CHARGER BALLOON CATHETER WAS ADVANCED FOR DILATATION. HOWEVER, DURING INFLATION AT 4 ATMOSPHERES THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A DIFFERENT DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S STATUS WAS FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7961653 ↗MalfunctionOct 2, 2018Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO BALLOONS BURST. DURING A TREATMENT PROCEDURE OF A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUTION (CTO) IN THE RIGHT ILIAC VEIN. THE PHYSICIAN USED AN ULTRA ICE PLUS IMAGING CATHETER BUT WAS NOT ABLE TO CROSS THE STENOSIS. THE IMAGING CATHETER WAS CHANGED FOR AN OPTICROSS 18 IVUS DEVICE WHICH WORKED WITHOUT ANY PROBLEM. DURING THE PROCEDURE A WALLSTENT WAS IMPLANTED AND TWO BALLOON CATHETERS (CHARGER BALLOON AND THE XXL BALLOON) WERE USED BUT RUPTURED. THE BALLOONS WERE REMOVED INTACT AND NOTHING LEFT BEHIND IN THE PATIENT. THEY USED ANOTHER OF THE SAME BALLOON TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE PATIENT WAS FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7926143 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page