Advanix™ Pancreatic Stent M00536890Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Pancreatic Stent · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Advanix Pancreatic Stent (48)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729856481), received between Apr 30, 2020 and Aug 11, 2026 — classified as 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Deformation” (9 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Deformation9
- Use of Device Problem2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 11, 2026Material Deformation
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50211002 ↗MalfunctionDec 30, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE PANCREATIC DRAINAGE (ERPD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL PART OF THE STENT WAS BENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23927681 ↗MalfunctionDec 30, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE PANCREATIC DRAINAGE (ERPD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL PART OF THE STENT WAS BENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23926603 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2025Use of Device Problem; Material Deformation; Use of Device Problem; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS IMPLANTED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE PANCREATIC DRAINAGE (ERPD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL PART WAS BENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING THIS DEVICE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE GOOD. NOTE: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GUIDEWIRE WAS IN THE PATIENT DURING THE ATTEMPTED DEPLOYMENT. PER THE IFU, "IF THE GUIDEWIRE IS NOT COMPLETELY RETRACTED INTO THE PUSHER, THE STENT CANNOT BE FULLY DEPLOYED." THE USER DID NOT FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22513211 ↗MalfunctionJul 15, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED TO TREAT AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE BILIARY DRAINAGE DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE PANCREATIC DRAINAGE (ERPD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL PART WAS BENT. ORIGINAL DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22513210 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT FOR BILIARY DRAINAGE DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PANCREATIC STENT'S PIGTAIL WAS BENT. THE PHYSICIAN WAS COMFORTABLE LEAVING THE STENT IN PLACE, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THIS DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT CONDITION AFTER THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22015367 ↗MalfunctionApr 9, 2024Use of Device Problem; Material Deformation; Use of Device Problem; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC PIGTAIL STENT WAS TO BE IMPLANTED IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC NASOBILIARY DRAINAGE (ENBD) PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE DISTAL PART OF THE STENT WAS KINKED. ANOTHER ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. NOTE: IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BARB FLAP COVER WAS NOT USED TO INSERT THE DEVICE THROUGH THE BIOPSY CAP. PER THE ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), "SLIDE THE STENT BARB COVER SECURELY INTO THE BIOPSY CAP" THE USER DID NOT FOLLOW THE IFU AS THE USER DID NOT USE THE BARB FLAP COVER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19072515 ↗MalfunctionJun 13, 2023Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS USED DURING A DRAINAGE PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2023. DURING THE PROCEDURE AND INSIDE THE PATIENT, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT WAS BENT. ANOTHER ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17122472 ↗MalfunctionApr 30, 2020Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS USED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON BILE DUCT, PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2020. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING PREPARATION, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE PANCREATIC STENT PIGTAIL WAS KINKED. ANOTHER ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS OPENED AND SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10015327 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page