Advanix™ Pancreatic Stent M00536760Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Pancreatic Stent · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Advanix Pancreatic Stent (48)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729856962), received between Apr 3, 2018 and May 1, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break1
- Kinked1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 1, 2019Break; Use of Device Problem; Break; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS USED IN AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE IN THE DUODENUM PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO LOAD THE 3FR. ADVANIX PANCREATIC DUCT STENT OVER THE .025 JAGWIRE, THE STENT WOULD NOT FIT OVER THE GUIDEWIRE. REPORTEDLY, THE STENT WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED OVER THE GUIDEWIRE AND SHEARED OFF THE STENT AND IT BROKE IN HALF. THE ENTIRE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A 4FR. ADVANIX PANCREATIC DUCT STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8570055 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2018Kinked; Kinked
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT PIGTAIL WAS USED DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) AND STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE PERFORMED IN THE PANCREATIC DUCT ON (B)(6) 2018. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN LOADED THE PUSHER ON AND ATTEMPTED TO DEPLOY THE ADVANIX 3F PLASTIC STENT, HOWEVER, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE STENT COILED UP INTO THE PUSHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A 4F ADVANIX STENT. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7392957 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page