Advanix™ Pancreatic Stent M00536370Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · Pancreatic Stent · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Advanix Pancreatic Stent (48)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08714729857310), received between Jul 18, 2018 and Jul 18, 2018 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination /Decontamination Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 18, 2018Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT WAS USED IN AN ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY (ERCP) PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, ON (B)(6) 2018, WHILE THE ENDOSCOPE WAS BEING PRE-CLEANED AND BRUSHED IN PREPARATION FOR A PROCEDURE, AN ADVANIX PANCREATIC STENT CAME OUT OF THE WORKING CHANNEL AS THE CLEANING BRUSH WAS BEING PUSHED DOWN THE BIOPSY CHANNEL. THE STENT WAS NOT INTRODUCED INTO THE PATIENT DURING THE PROCEDURE, AND IT IS SUSPECTED THAT THE STENT WAS LODGED IN THE SCOPE BEFORE THE PROCEDURE HAD STARTED. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE FINE. FOLLOWING THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS GIVEN A PHONE CALL AND WAS INFORMED OF THE POTENTIAL RISK OF INFECTION DUE TO THE DEVICE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO FURTHER ACTION REPORTED FOR THIS PATIENT. NO TREATMENT OR HOSPITAL STAY WERE REPORTED DUE TO THIS INCIDENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7698450 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page