Expel™ Drainage Catheter with Twist-Loc™ Hub H7493931110250Recalls & reported problems
Boston Scientific Corporation · MPDL Drainage Catheter · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08714729860594), received between Apr 8, 2019 and Nov 18, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 18, 2019Break; Break
REPORTED VIA MEDWATCH FACILITY# (B)(4). IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS FOUND TO BE IN THREE PIECES AND A PIECE WAS LEFT INSIDE PATIENT. A 10.3/25 EXPEL DRAINAGE CATHETER WITH TWIST-LOC HUB WAS USED FOR A CHOLECYSTOSTOMY TUBE CHANGE. THE DEVICE WAS FOUND TO BE IN THREE PIECES AND TWO PIECES WERE RETRIEVED. HOWEVER, A THIRD PIECE WAS LEFT IN THE GALLBLADDER. NO FURTHER PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 9335036 ↗MalfunctionSep 12, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DRAINAGE WAS SEPARATED INTO MULTIPLE PIECES. THE TARGET LESION WAS LOCATED IN THE PERI PANCREATIC AREA. A 10.3/25 EXPEL DRAINAGE CATHETER WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING PROCEDURE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS SEPARATED INTO MULTIPLE PIECES AFTER THREE WEEKS. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME EXPEL DRAINAGE CATHETER TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9009743 ↗MalfunctionApr 8, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation
IIT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUTURE WAS CUT FROM THE CATHETER. A 10.3/25 EXPEL DRAINAGE CATHETER WITH TWIST-LOC HUB WAS SELECTED FOR USE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN PLACED THE DEVICE TO THE TARGET AREA AND WAS SUCCESSFUL. HE ATTEMPTED TO LOOP THE DEVICE BY PULLING THE SUTURE AND HE FOUND SUTURE WAS CUT FROM THE CATHETER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER OF THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS STABLE AFTER THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8492409 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page