Skip to content

Armada 1013469-120Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · Armada 18 PTA Catheter 5.5 mm x 120 mm x 150 cm / Over-The-Wire · Class 2

All models of Armada (213)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648208324), received between Dec 5, 2019 and Aug 4, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Deflation Problem1
  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 4, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A SEVERELY STENOSED LESION IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THE 5.5X120MM ARMADA 18 BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION HOWEVER THE BALLOON RUPTURED DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 14 ATMOSPHERES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22700185 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 16, 2021Material Rupture; Material Separation; Material Rupture; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY / POPLITEAL ARTERY. THE 5.5 X 120 MM ARMADA 18 DILATATION CATHETER WAS PREPARED FOR USE AND NO ISSUES WERE NOTED. THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED INTO THE PATIENT ANATOMY. THE DILATATION CATHETER BALLOON WAS INFLATED THREE TIMES. AFTER THE THIRD INFLATION TO 14 ATMOSPHERES, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE RUPTURE WAS LARGE AND THE BALLOON SEPARATED FROM THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY AND ALL SEPARATED PIECES WERE REMOVED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT OR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13021246 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 5, 2019Deflation Problem; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER INFLATION OF THE ARMADA 18 PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) CATHETER ONCE TO 8 ATMOSPHERES, THE BALLOON EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE AND COULD NOT BE PULLED BACK INTO THE SHEATH BECAUSE IT WAS NOT FULLY DEFLATED. NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS HELD FOR 10 SECONDS. IT WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT ISSUE; HOWEVER IT WAS UNABLE TO BE RE-INSERTED BACK INTO THE SHEATH. ANOTHER BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9417748 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page