Armada 1013469-120Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · Armada 18 PTA Catheter 5.5 mm x 120 mm x 150 cm / Over-The-Wire · Class 2
All models of Armada (213)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648208324), received between Dec 5, 2019 and Aug 4, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture2
- Deflation Problem1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Difficult to Remove1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 4, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A SEVERELY STENOSED LESION IN THE LEFT PROXIMAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY. THE 5.5X120MM ARMADA 18 BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION HOWEVER THE BALLOON RUPTURED DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 14 ATMOSPHERES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER DEVICE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22700185 ↗MalfunctionDec 16, 2021Material Rupture; Material Separation; Material Rupture; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A SEVERELY CALCIFIED LESION IN THE LEFT SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY / POPLITEAL ARTERY. THE 5.5 X 120 MM ARMADA 18 DILATATION CATHETER WAS PREPARED FOR USE AND NO ISSUES WERE NOTED. THE DEVICE WAS ADVANCED INTO THE PATIENT ANATOMY. THE DILATATION CATHETER BALLOON WAS INFLATED THREE TIMES. AFTER THE THIRD INFLATION TO 14 ATMOSPHERES, THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE RUPTURE WAS LARGE AND THE BALLOON SEPARATED FROM THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY AND ALL SEPARATED PIECES WERE REMOVED WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT OR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13021246 ↗MalfunctionDec 5, 2019Deflation Problem; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER INFLATION OF THE ARMADA 18 PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) CATHETER ONCE TO 8 ATMOSPHERES, THE BALLOON EXPERIENCED RESISTANCE AND COULD NOT BE PULLED BACK INTO THE SHEATH BECAUSE IT WAS NOT FULLY DEFLATED. NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS HELD FOR 10 SECONDS. IT WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT ISSUE; HOWEVER IT WAS UNABLE TO BE RE-INSERTED BACK INTO THE SHEATH. ANOTHER BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9417748 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page