Skip to content

ProDisc PDL-M-PT10SRecalls & reported problems

Synthes (U.S.A.) LP · POLYETHYLENE INLAY W/TANTALUM MARKER/MEDIUM-10MM-STERILE · Class 3 · Implant

All models of ProDisc (9)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034700137), received between Feb 6, 2013 and Jan 30, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3

Patient problems

  • Pain2
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • No Code Available1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 30, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH A PRODISC L IMPLANT AT L5-S1 ON (B)(6) 2019. PATIENT EXPERIENCED INSTABILITY AT THE LEVEL DUE TO A BILATERAL PARS FRACTURE. THE PDL IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND THE PATIENT WAS FUSED ON (B)(6) 2025.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 21273785 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE IS A PRODISC-L REMOVAL SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2018. THE CASE IS TO ADDRESS A PRODISC-L REMOVAL AT L5-S1 WITH THE PRIMARY GOAL OF REPLACING THE IMPLANT WITH A FUSION DEVICE. THE ADJACENT LEVELS ARE FUSED WITH NON-SYNTHES DEVICES. NO OTHER LEVELS ARE TO BE OPERATED ON. THIS IS NOT AN ADJACENT LEVEL CASE. THE EXACT REASON FOR REMOVAL IS UNKNOWN. CONCOMITANT DEVICES REPORTED: UNKNOWN FUSION HARDWARE (PART # UNKNOWN, LOT # UNKNOWN, QUANTITY # UNKNOWN). THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES THREE (3) DEVICES. THIS REPORT IS 2 OF 3 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 7481868 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2013Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 2945052 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC devices

All PROSTHESIS, INTERVERTEBRAL DISC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page