NA 03.615.002Recalls & reported problems
Synthes GmbH · RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL/LATERAL · Class 1
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034715223), received between Nov 15, 2017 and Feb 18, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Slipped” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Slipped2
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Failure To Adhere Or Bond1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Mechanical Problem1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Code Available1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 18, 2026Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE SMALL SCREWS THAT SECURE THE PIECE FOR RETRACTION OF THE BLADES KEEP LOOSENING AND ALLOWING THE PIECE FOR RETRACTION TO DETACH FROM THE RETRACTOR FRAME. NO PATIENT HARM. NO SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24376797 ↗MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Use of Device Problem; Material Integrity Problem; Use of Device Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PRE-OPERATIVE TESTING IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE FLEX ARM WAS MISSING FIXING BOLTS, HAD BROKEN BEARING, AND THE FLEXIBLE HOSE TENSIONER WING NUT WAS NOT LOCKED. ALSO, THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL LATERAL WAS MISSING A FIXING BOLT AND ITS PRESSER FOOT HOLDER DID NOT HOLD POSITION. THE INSTRUMENTS WERE NOT USED DURING THE OPERATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23771779 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2020Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2002, THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING A L3-L5 MICRO DISC ON A PATIENT WITH THE SYNTHES INSIGHT BLADE RETRACTOR. THE SURGEON COULD NOT EXPAND OR TOE OUT EITHER OF THE RETRACTOR FRAMES, TRIED BOTH THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL/LATERAL AND RETRACTOR FRAME CRANIAL/CAUDAL. THE SURGEON ALSO DEMONSTRATED HOW ON 1 OF THE 2 ARMS THAT RATCHET THAT HOLDS THE ARM ARTICULATED MUST BE WORN OUT. THE ARM ON BOTH OF THESE RETRACTOR FRAMES WILL NOT HOLD. SURGICAL DELAY WAS ABOUT 4 MINUTES WHILE THE SURGEON ADJUSTED THE RETRACTOR TO MAKE IT WORK. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THIS IS REPORT 01 OF 02 OF (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 9741272 ↗MalfunctionSep 13, 2019Device Slipped; Device Slipped
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2019 DURING SURGERY THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL LATERAL AND RETRACTOR FRAME CRANIAL CAUDAL DISTRACTORS OF THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL SUPPORT SYSTEM HAVE WORN OUT AND SLIPPING DURING SURGERY. THEY NO LONGER HOLD THE POSITION TIGHTLY THEY ARE INTENDED TO. SURGICAL DELAY IS UNKNOWN. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY. PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN. THIS IS REPORT 1 FOR 3 (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9035306 ↗MalfunctionSep 13, 2019Device Slipped; Device Slipped
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2019 DURING SURGERY THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL LATERAL AND RETRACTOR FRAME CRANIAL CAUDAL DISTRACTORS OF THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL SUPPORT SYSTEM HAVE WORN OUT AND SLIPPING DURING SURGERY. THEY NO LONGER HOLD THE POSITION TIGHTLY THEY ARE INTENDED TO. SURGICAL DELAY IS UNKNOWN. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY. PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN. THIS IS REPORT 3 FOR 3 (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9035272 ↗MalfunctionNov 15, 2017Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Failure To Adhere Or Bond
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(4) REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THE FLEX ARMS ARE NOT HOLDING THE RETRACTOR FRAMES (CRANIAL CAUDAL AND MEDIAL LATERAL). IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PUSH THE FRAMES INTO THE HOLDING RING SLEEVE, SOMETHING IS BLOCKING INSIDE. THIS WAS DETECTED BEFORE THE SURGERY. NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: HOLDING SLEEVE RING (PART # UNKNOWN, LOT # UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 1). THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL/LATERAL. THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 4 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7033307 ↗
Other RETRACTOR devices
- Endo Paddle Retract 173046Covidien LP · RETRACTOR56 reports
- Omni-Tract® 4040Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall3 reports
- Omni-Tract® 11275Integra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- RadiaLux™ 50-101-1Medtronic Navigation, Inc. · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- CHARNLEY 9620-04-000Depuy International Ltd · RETRACTOR1 recall2 reports
- NA 2176-10-000Depuy (Ireland) · RETRACTOR51 reports
- Fathom MR2-102050Seaspine Orthopedics Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall1 report
- Omni-Tract® 11303RIntegra Lifesciences Corporation · RETRACTOR1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page