Skip to content

NA 03.615.002Recalls & reported problems

Synthes GmbH · RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL/LATERAL · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10705034715223), received between Nov 15, 2017 and Feb 18, 2026 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Slipped” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Slipped2
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Failure To Adhere Or Bond1
  • Material Integrity Problem1
  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Use of Device Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Code Available1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 18, 2026Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THE SMALL SCREWS THAT SECURE THE PIECE FOR RETRACTION OF THE BLADES KEEP LOOSENING AND ALLOWING THE PIECE FOR RETRACTION TO DETACH FROM THE RETRACTOR FRAME. NO PATIENT HARM. NO SURGICAL DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24376797 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 10, 2025Use of Device Problem; Material Integrity Problem; Use of Device Problem; Material Integrity Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PRE-OPERATIVE TESTING IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE FLEX ARM WAS MISSING FIXING BOLTS, HAD BROKEN BEARING, AND THE FLEXIBLE HOSE TENSIONER WING NUT WAS NOT LOCKED. ALSO, THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL LATERAL WAS MISSING A FIXING BOLT AND ITS PRESSER FOOT HOLDER DID NOT HOLD POSITION. THE INSTRUMENTS WERE NOT USED DURING THE OPERATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23771779 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2020Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2002, THE SURGEON WAS PERFORMING A L3-L5 MICRO DISC ON A PATIENT WITH THE SYNTHES INSIGHT BLADE RETRACTOR. THE SURGEON COULD NOT EXPAND OR TOE OUT EITHER OF THE RETRACTOR FRAMES, TRIED BOTH THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL/LATERAL AND RETRACTOR FRAME CRANIAL/CAUDAL. THE SURGEON ALSO DEMONSTRATED HOW ON 1 OF THE 2 ARMS THAT RATCHET THAT HOLDS THE ARM ARTICULATED MUST BE WORN OUT. THE ARM ON BOTH OF THESE RETRACTOR FRAMES WILL NOT HOLD. SURGICAL DELAY WAS ABOUT 4 MINUTES WHILE THE SURGEON ADJUSTED THE RETRACTOR TO MAKE IT WORK. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. NO HARM TO THE PATIENT. THIS IS REPORT 01 OF 02 OF (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9741272 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 13, 2019Device Slipped; Device Slipped

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2019 DURING SURGERY THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL LATERAL AND RETRACTOR FRAME CRANIAL CAUDAL DISTRACTORS OF THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL SUPPORT SYSTEM HAVE WORN OUT AND SLIPPING DURING SURGERY. THEY NO LONGER HOLD THE POSITION TIGHTLY THEY ARE INTENDED TO. SURGICAL DELAY IS UNKNOWN. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY. PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN. THIS IS REPORT 1 FOR 3 (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9035306 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 13, 2019Device Slipped; Device Slipped

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2019 DURING SURGERY THE RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL LATERAL AND RETRACTOR FRAME CRANIAL CAUDAL DISTRACTORS OF THE MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL SUPPORT SYSTEM HAVE WORN OUT AND SLIPPING DURING SURGERY. THEY NO LONGER HOLD THE POSITION TIGHTLY THEY ARE INTENDED TO. SURGICAL DELAY IS UNKNOWN. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY. PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN. THIS IS REPORT 3 FOR 3 (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9035272 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 15, 2017Failure To Adhere Or Bond; Failure To Adhere Or Bond

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(4) REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THE FLEX ARMS ARE NOT HOLDING THE RETRACTOR FRAMES (CRANIAL CAUDAL AND MEDIAL LATERAL). IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO PUSH THE FRAMES INTO THE HOLDING RING SLEEVE, SOMETHING IS BLOCKING INSIDE. THIS WAS DETECTED BEFORE THE SURGERY. NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: HOLDING SLEEVE RING (PART # UNKNOWN, LOT # UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 1). THIS REPORT IS FOR ONE (1) RETRACTOR FRAME MEDIAL/LATERAL. THIS IS REPORT 3 OF 4 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7033307 ↗

Other RETRACTOR devices

All RETRACTOR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page