Skip to content

VITROS 8150112Recalls & reported problems

Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc. · VITROS Chemistry Products LAC Slides · Class 1

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
1

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10758750004454), received between Sep 3, 2024 and Sep 23, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “High Test Results” (8 reports).

1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 4 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 3 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520264
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Recalls naming this device

  1. Jul 29, 2025Open, Classified

    VITROS Chemistry Products LAC Slides on VITROS XT 3400 and VITROS XT 7600 Systems are experiencing an increased occurrence of calibration failure related to lots from coating 0130 and above with Condition Code TH4-63J during calibration, causing the delay of lac test results and potentially impact patient management. The issue was identified by QuidelOrtho through an increase in customer complaints compared to the historical baseline with average failure rate of 1% for coating 0130 in 2025 while average of failure rate for other coating was 0.06% in 2025 and average of failure rate for all coatings is 0.03% for 2024.

    Z-2560-2025 · Root cause: Device Design · FDA record ↗

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • High Test Results8
  • Low Test Results1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026High Test Results; Low Test Results

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50872030 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2025High Test Results; High Test Results

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT HIGHER THAN EXPECTED LACTATE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS (CAP) PROFICIENCY SAMPLES USING VITROS CHEMISTRY PRODUCTS LACTATE (LAC) SLIDES LOT 3533-0125-2686 ON A VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM. CAP SAMPLE CHM-12 RESULTS OF 5.37 AND 5.25 MMOL/L VS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF 4.52 MMOL/L CAP SAMPLE CHM-14 RESULT OF 4.5 MMOL/L VS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF 3.87 MMOL/L BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED ON PATIENT SAMPLES. THE HIGHER-THAN-EXPECTED VITROS LAC RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM PROFICIENCY SAMPLES AND NO RESULTS WERE REPORTED FROM THE LABORATORY. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS NUMBER THREE OF THREE MDRS FOR THIS EVENT. THREE 3500A FORMS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS EVENT AS THREE DEVICES WERE INVOLVED. THIS REPORT CORRESPONDS TO ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS INC (ORTHO) COMPLAINT NUMBER (B)(4) AND REPORTABILITY ASSESSMENT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21473135 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2025High Test Results; High Test Results

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT HIGHER THAN EXPECTED LACTATE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS (CAP) PROFICIENCY SAMPLES USING VITROS CHEMISTRY PRODUCTS LACTATE (LAC) SLIDES LOT 3533-0125-2686 ON A VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM. CAP SAMPLE CHM-12 RESULTS OF 5.37 AND 5.25 MMOL/L VS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF 4.52 MMOL/L CAP SAMPLE CHM-14 RESULT OF 4.5 MMOL/L VS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF 3.87 MMOL/L BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED ON PATIENT SAMPLES. THE HIGHER-THAN-EXPECTED VITROS LAC RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM PROFICIENCY SAMPLES AND NO RESULTS WERE REPORTED FROM THE LABORATORY. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS NUMBER TWO OF THREE MDRS FOR THIS EVENT. THREE 3500A FORMS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS EVENT AS THREE DEVICES WERE INVOLVED. THIS REPORT CORRESPONDS TO ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS INC (ORTHO) COMPLAINT NUMBER (B)(4) AND REPORTABILITY ASSESSMENT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21473132 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 26, 2025High Test Results; High Test Results

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT HIGHER THAN EXPECTED LACTATE RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS (CAP) PROFICIENCY SAMPLES USING VITROS CHEMISTRY PRODUCTS LACTATE (LAC) SLIDES LOT 3533-0125-2686 ON A VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM. CAP SAMPLE CHM-12 RESULTS OF 5.37 AND 5.25 MMOL/L VS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF 4.52 MMOL/L CAP SAMPLE CHM-14 RESULT OF 4.5 MMOL/L VS AN EXPECTED RESULT OF 3.87 MMOL/L BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED ON PATIENT SAMPLES. THE HIGHER-THAN-EXPECTED VITROS LAC RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM PROFICIENCY SAMPLES AND NO RESULTS WERE REPORTED FROM THE LABORATORY. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS NUMBER ONE OF THREE MDRS FOR THIS EVENT. THREE 3500A FORMS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS EVENT AS THREE DEVICES WERE INVOLVED. THIS REPORT CORRESPONDS TO ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS INC (ORTHO) COMPLAINT NUMBER (B)(4) AND REPORTABILITY ASSESSMENT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21473112 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024High Test Results; High Test Results

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT HIGHER THAN EXPECTED VITROS LACTATE (LAC) RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM FOUR DIFFERENT PATIENT SAMPLES WHEN TESTED ON A VITROS XT 7600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM. THE AFFECTED RESULTS WERE PROCESSED USING A NEW COLLECTION DEVICE (PLASMA SEPARATOR TUBE (PST)) AND WERE HIGHER THAN EXPECTED WHEN COMPARED TO THE RESULTS FROM THE SAME PATIENT SAMPLES PROCESSED USING THE CUSTOMER'S IN-USE COLLECTION DEVICE, THE FLUORIDE OXALATE TUBE. PATIENT SAMPLE 4 LAC RESULT OF 4.1 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 3.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 11 LAC RESULT OF 2.2 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 0.9 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 12 LAC RESULT OF 2.5 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 19 LAC RESULT OF 2.4 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.9 MMOL/L BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE HIGHER-THAN-EXPECTED VITROS LAC RESULTS WERE OBSERVED ON PATIENT SAMPLES, HOWEVER THESE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ALLEGATIONS OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. T

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20128457 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024High Test Results; High Test Results

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT HIGHER THAN EXPECTED VITROS LACTATE (LAC) RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM FOUR DIFFERENT PATIENT SAMPLES WHEN TESTED ON A VITROS XT 7600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM. THE AFFECTED RESULTS WERE PROCESSED USING A NEW COLLECTION DEVICE (PLASMA SEPARATOR TUBE (PST)) AND WERE HIGHER THAN EXPECTED WHEN COMPARED TO THE RESULTS FROM THE SAME PATIENT SAMPLES PROCESSED USING THE CUSTOMER'S IN-USE COLLECTION DEVICE, THE FLUORIDE OXALATE TUBE. PATIENT SAMPLE 4 LAC RESULT OF 4.1 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 3.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 11 LAC RESULT OF 2.2 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 0.9 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 12 LAC RESULT OF 2.5 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 19 LAC RESULT OF 2.4 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.9 MMOL/L BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE HIGHER THAN EXPECTED VITROS LAC RESULTS WERE OBSERVED ON PATIENT SAMPLES, HOWEVER THESE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ALLEGATIONS OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. T

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20128399 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024High Test Results; High Test Results

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT HIGHER THAN EXPECTED VITROS LACTATE (LAC) RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM FOUR DIFFERENT PATIENT SAMPLES WHEN TESTED ON A VITROS XT 7600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM. THE AFFECTED RESULTS WERE PROCESSED USING A NEW COLLECTION DEVICE (PLASMA SEPARATOR TUBE (PST)) AND WERE HIGHER THAN EXPECTED WHEN COMPARED TO THE RESULTS FROM THE SAME PATIENT SAMPLES PROCESSED USING THE CUSTOMER'S IN-USE COLLECTION DEVICE, THE FLUORIDE OXALATE TUBE. PATIENT SAMPLE 4 LAC RESULT OF 4.1 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 3.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 11 LAC RESULT OF 2.2 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 0.9 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 12 LAC RESULT OF 2.5 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 19 LAC RESULT OF 2.4 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.9 MMOL/L BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE HIGHER THAN EXPECTED VITROS LAC RESULTS WERE OBSERVED ON PATIENT SAMPLES, HOWEVER THESE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ALLEGATIONS OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. T

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20128395 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 3, 2024High Test Results; High Test Results

    A CUSTOMER CONTACTED THE ORTHO CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS (ORTHO) TECHNICAL SOLUTION CENTER (TSC) TO REPORT HIGHER THAN EXPECTED VITROS LACTATE (LAC) RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM FOUR DIFFERENT PATIENT SAMPLES WHEN TESTED ON A VITROS XT 7600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM. THE AFFECTED RESULTS WERE PROCESSED USING A NEW COLLECTION DEVICE (PLASMA SEPARATOR TUBE (PST)) AND WERE HIGHER THAN EXPECTED WHEN COMPARED TO THE RESULTS FROM THE SAME PATIENT SAMPLES PROCESSED USING THE CUSTOMER'S IN-USE COLLECTION DEVICE, THE FLUORIDE OXALATE TUBE. PATIENT SAMPLE 4 LAC RESULT OF 4.1 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 3.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 11 LAC RESULT OF 2.2 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 0.9 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 12 LAC RESULT OF 2.5 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.5 MMOL/L PATIENT SAMPLE 19 LAC RESULT OF 2.4 MMOL/L VS. THE EXPECTED RESULT OF 1.9 MMOL/L BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION IF THEY WERE TO OCCUR UNDETECTED. THE HIGHER THAN EXPECTED VITROS LAC RESULTS WERE OBSERVED ON PATIENT SAMPLES, HOWEVER THESE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ALLEGATIONS OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT. T

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20128213 ↗

Other ACID, LACTIC, ENZYMATIC METHOD devices

All ACID, LACTIC, ENZYMATIC METHOD devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page