Skip to content

FiberStitch™ Implant 1.5, Straight (RC) with two Polyester Implants and 2-0 Fibe AR-19032SRecalls & reported problems

T.A.G Medical Products Agricultural Cooperative Association · FiberStitch™ Implant 1.5, Straight (RC) with two Polyester Implants and 2-0 FiberWire Suture · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10818674027417), received between Oct 29, 2024 and Oct 29, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 29, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON 10/15/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A PATIENT VIA PHONE THAT SHE WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN AND INFLAMMATION POST-OPERATIVELY AND INQUIRED ABOUT THE MATERIAL COMPOSITION OF SEVERAL KNOWN AND UNKNOWN ARTHREX PRODUCTS. DURING AN INITIAL ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023, QTY. 2 OF AN AR-2324BCM SUTURE ANCHOR, BIO-COMPOSITE SWIVELOCK SP, AN AR-3633SP FIBERTAK SP SUTURE ANCHOR, AND AN AR-3670 FIBERTAK BICEPS IMPLANT SYSTEM WERE IMPLANTED. AFTER 6 WEEKS POST-OP, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED INCREASING PAIN AND INFLAMMATION, BUT THE INITIAL SURGEON DID NOT WANT TO PERFORM REVISION SURGERY AND STATED THAT NOTHING WAS WRONG. THE PATIENT THEN WENT TO ANOTHER SURGEON WHO PERFORMED REVISION SURGERY ON THE RIGHT SHOULDER ON (B)(6) 2024. IT WAS FOUND THAT THE SUTURES TO ONE OF THE ANCHORS WERE LOOSE; NOTHING HAD BROKEN INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON CUT THE LOOSE SUTURES AND REMOVED THEM, BUT THE ANCHOR AND ALL OTHER DEVICES FROM THE INITIAL SURGERY REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT. DURING THE ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE, ADDITIONAL UNKNOWN ARTHREX SUTURE ANCHORS, SWIVELOCK ANCHORS, AND A GRAFT WERE IMPLANTED USING THE ARTHREX CUFFMEND SYSTEM. AFTER THE ADDITIONAL SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN AND

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 20560500 ↗

Other Fastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue devices

All Fastener, Fixation, Nondegradable, Soft Tissue devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page