Evolution G23126Recalls & reported problems
Cook Ireland Ltd · EVOLUTION BILIARY, STENT SYSTEM - UNCOVERED · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Evolution (21)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002231266), received between Dec 20, 2018 and Oct 30, 2025 — classified as 7 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem3
- Break3
- Deformation Due to Compressive Stress2
- Defective Component1
- Loss of or Failure to Bond1
- No Apparent Adverse Event1
- Separation Problem1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 30, 2025Break; Break
DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: DURING ERCP STENT PLACEMENT, USER ADVANCED THE DELIVERY SYSTEM THROUGH WIRE GUIDE TO DESIRED POSITION AND START TO RELEASE ACCORDING TO IFU, BUT FOUND OUT THE STENT CANNOT BE DEPLOYED. USER RETRACTED THE DEVICE AND FOUND OUT THE PUSHING SHEATH ( FLEXOR)BROKEN. USER CHANGED TO A NEW ONE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. PATIENT OUTCOME "A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE." PATIENT/EVENT INFO - NOTES ADD INFO REQUESTED 20-AUG-2025 UPDATED ON 29AUG2025 WHAT WAS THE POSITION OF THE ELEVATOR? CLOSED DETAILS OF THE WIRE GUIDE USED (DIAMETER, TYPE, MAKE)? ACRO-35-450 WAS THE ZIP PORT FACING UPWARDS AND SLIGHTLY CURVED WHEN BACKLOADING THE WIRE GUIDE? YES DID ANY PART OF THE STENT CONTACT THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WHEN THE COMPLAINT OCCURRED? YES PLEASE ADVISE THE ANATOMICAL LOCATION OF THE INTENDED TARGET SITE. COMMON BILE DUCT WERE ANY OTHER DEFECTS (OTHER THAN THE COMPLAINT ISSUE) OBSERVED ON THE DEVICE PRIOR TO RETURN (E.G., KINK)? NO PLEASE PROVIDE THE STATUS
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23424484 ↗MalfunctionNov 28, 2022Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE COMPLETION OF LAB EVALUATION ON (B)(6) 2023.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15868648 ↗MalfunctionAug 4, 2022Loss of or Failure to Bond; Break; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Break
INFORMATION AS OF (B)(6) 2022: SYSTEM WAS PLACED IN BILE DUCT AND STENT WAS RELEASED. ON REMOVING SAFETY WIRE ON ABOUT 30 CM RESISTANCE WAS FELT AND COULDN'T BE TAKEN OUT FURTHER. AFTER TAKING OUT SAFETY WIRE COMPLETELY, STENT COULD BE RELEASED. AFTER FINISHING PROCEDURE, A METAL PIN WAS DISCOVERED AT PORT ENTRY. LAB EVALUATION (B)(6) 2022. VISUAL INSPECTION: PROTECTIVE TUBING IN PLACE ON RETURN. RED MARKER ON SECOND LAST DIMPLING ON RETURN. LOCK WIRE NOT RETURNED. CANNULA EXPOSED AT THE BACK OF THE HANDLE . INTRODUCER EXPOSED ON RETURN , NO STENT RETURNED. FUNCTIONAL INSPECTION: HANDLE ACTUATING FINE FOR DEPLOYMENT AND RECAPTURE OF INTRODUCER. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. AT WHAT STAGE OF THE PROCEDURE DID THE COMPLAINT OCCUR? DURING STENT PLACEMENT. WHAT ENDOSCOPE TYPE AND CHANNEL SIZE WAS USED? 4.2 MM. WHAT WAS THE POSITION OF THE ELEVATOR? OPEN. DETAILS OF THE WIRE GUIDE USED (DIAMETER, TYPE, MAKE)? 0,035 INCH, JAGWIRE, BSCI. WAS THE ZIP PORT FACING UPWARDS
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15162435 ↗MalfunctionFeb 2, 2021Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Separation Problem; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Separation Problem
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 11266842 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2019Defective Component; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Defective Component; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
AS PER CC FORM: "THE CUSTOMER START TO DEPLOY THE STENT BUT IT DID NOT OPEN. ONLY THE SAFETY WIRE WENT OUT OF THE HANDLE. THEY RECAPTURE THE STENT , FIXED THE SAFETY WIRE AND STARTED AGAIN. NOW IT WORKED, THE STENT OPENED AND ON THE POINT OF NO RETURN THE TRIED TO REMOVE THE SAFETY WIRE. UNFORTUNATELY IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE SAFETY WIRE RIPPED OFF".
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9232628 ↗MalfunctionFeb 26, 2019Use of Device Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event; Use of Device Problem; No Apparent Adverse Event
THIS FOLLOW UP MDR REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED TO CANCEL THE INITIAL REPORT. THIS FILE IS RELATED TO PR (B)(4) AND WAS CREATED TO CAPTURE THE OFF LABEL USE NOTED IN THE ORIGINAL FILE. STENT IN STENT ¿ OFF LABEL USE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8370685 ↗MalfunctionDec 20, 2018Break; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Break; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem
THIS FILE IS FDA MDR REPORTABLE BASED ON THE DEVICE MALFUNCTION REPORTING PRECEDENCE FOR THIS DEVICE FAMILY FOR THE ISSUE OF "DEPLOYMENT ISSUE THAT RESULTS IN THE EXPOSED STENT REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH THE DELIVERY SYSTEM" AND "SAFETY WIRE BREAKAGE." PER COMPLAINT FORM: "GOAL WAS TO PLACE A LONGER EVOLUTION BILIARY STENT THROUGH THE COVERED VIAL STENT THAT WAS ALREADY IN PLACE -AFTER TRAVERSING VIABLE COVERED STENT WITH GUIDE WIRE AND EVOLUTION METAL STENT - STENT WAS PARTIALLY DEPLOYED AND RECAPTURED ONCE - THEN WHEN ATTEMPTING TO DEPLOY STENT ( THEY DID GO PAST THE POINT OF NO RETURN A SMALL AMOUNT ) THEY WERE UNABLE TO REMOVE THE SAFETY WIRE TO ALLOW FULL DEPLOYMENT - WIRE BROKE OFF AT END UNDER EXTREME TENSION, GREEN WIRE NOTED CAUGHT AROUND STENT ( SOMETHING THEY HAVE NEVER SEEN BEFORE) THEY WERE UNABLE TO DETACH STENT FROM DEPLOYMENT DEVICE - ULTIMATELY REMOVING STENT AND DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM OUT OF PATIENT AND THROUGH ENDOSCOPE."
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8183548 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page