Skip to content

Solus G25673Recalls & reported problems

Cook Ireland Ltd · Solus, Double Pigtail Stent with Introducer · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002256733), received between Feb 21, 2020 and Mar 24, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method3
  • Difficult to Advance2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking2
  • Deformation Due to Compressive Stress1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 24, 2026Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    WHEN PHYSICIAN PUSH STENT OVER THE STENOSIS, HE WANTED TO PULL BACK THE INNER CATHETER. HE FOUND THAT HE COULDN'T PULL BACK HE INNER CATHETER, HE USED FORCE TO IT AND LED THE CATHETER BROKEN. FINALLY, HE CHANGED TO COMPETITOR'S PLASTIC STENT, THEN IT'S OKAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24672610 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 16, 2022Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Failure to Advance; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    USER DETECTED THE PUSHER CANNOT BE PUT THROUGH STENT AT PREPARATION STAGE. NO USE ON PATIENT. N/A ¿ THIS OBSERVATION WAS MADE PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14712492 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 25, 2021Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance

    SUPPLEMENTAL FOLLOW-UP REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION AND AN UPDATE TO THE INVESTIGATION CONCLUSIONS ON THE (B)(6) 2022.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 11378767 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2020Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance; Deformation Due to Compressive Stress; Difficult to Advance

    AS REPORTED TO CUSTOMER RELATIONS: "2 EA DEVICES, DURING THE SAME PROCEDURE, HAD THE SAME FAILURE MODE. BOTH MADE PATIENT CONTACT BUT ONLY 1 EA IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN (OTHER THROWN AWAY). DM EVALUATION OF RETURNABLE PRODUCT IS THAT THE PUSHING CATHETER KINKED DURING STENT ADVANCEMENT, AND WHEN THEY WERE TRYING TO DEPLOY THE GUIDING CATHETER THE WHITE CAP CAME OFF. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH UNKNOWN DEVICE. NO ADD'L PROCEDURES REQUIRED, NO ADVERSE EFFECTS EXPERIENCED BY PATIENT, NOTHING REMAINING IN PATIENT, NO PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION." .1 FOR ALL COMPLAINTS, ASK: 2.1.1 DOES THE COMPLAINT RELATE TO: DEVICE PLACEMENT (THIS ONE). DEVICE REMOVAL. OBSERVATION PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT. 2.1.2 PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE DEVICE WAS STORED PRIOR TO USE. IN THE BOX, IN THE PROCEDURE ROOM IN A CABINET. 2.1.3 WHAT IS THE REORDER NUMBER, OUTER DIAMETER AND LENGTH OF THE WIRE GUIDE THAT WAS USED WITH THIS DEVICE IN THIS PROCEDURE? UNKNOWN, EITHER .035 (BOSTON HYDROJAG) OR .025 (COOK). 2.1.4 WERE PREVIOUS PROCEDURES I.E. SPHINCTEROTOMY ETC. CARRIED OUT PRIOR TO PLACING THE DEVICE OVER THE PARTICULAR WIRE GUIDE? ASKU. IF YES, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED. 2.1.5 WAS THE WIRE GUIDE INS

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9929091 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 21, 2020Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Material Twisted/Bent; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Material Twisted/Bent

    SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO THE COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 9737810 ↗

Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page