Skip to content

Advance Micro G26407Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Advance Micro 14 Ultra Low-Profile PTA Balloon Catheter · Class 2

All models of Advance Micro (25)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002264073), received between Jul 17, 2017 and Mar 27, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 27, 2024Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    AS REPORTED, DURING A BELOW-THE-KNEE ANGIOPLASTY VIA ANTEGRADE ACCESS, AN ADVANCE MICRO 14 ULTRA LOW-PROFILE PTA BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURED. ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S 6-FRENCH SHEATH WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WAS REPORTEDLY DIFFICULT TO TRACK TO THE LESION DUE TO CALCIFICATION, WHICH WAS NOTED DURING WIRE ADVANCEMENT AND IMAGING. THE BALLOON CATHETER COULD NOT TRACK MORE THAN SEVEN CENTIMETERS FROM THE START OF THE PROXIMAL SEGMENT OF THE VESSEL. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED ONE TIME WITHIN A STENOSED LESION IN THE PROXIMAL SECTION OF A CRURAL VESSEL, USING ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S INFLATION DEVICE, TO APPROXIMATELY SIX-TO-EIGHT ATMOSPHERES; HOWEVER, THE BALLOON RUPTURED LONGITUDINALLY. THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE VESSEL WAS SIGNIFICANTLY CALCIFIED AND HAD POOR RUN OFF, WITH "THREADY" AND "PATCHY" FLOW ALONG THE LENGTH OF THE VESSEL. BLOOD WAS NOT NOTED IN THE INFLATION DEVICE, AND THE BALLOON WAS NOT INFLATED WITHIN A STENT. THE DEVICE WAS RETRIEVED THROUGH THE SHEATH, USING AN UNSPECIFIED SNARE. TREATMENT OF OTHER VESSELS WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER BALLOON; HOWEVER, THE VESSEL BEING TREATED AT THE TIME OF THIS EVENT WAS LEFT UNTREATED, DUE TO CALCIFICATION AND OTHER

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18988249 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 6, 2019Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED, A PATIENT OF UNKNOWN GENDER OR AGE WAS UNDERGOING AN ANGIOGRAM PROCEDURE USING A ADVANCE MICRO ¿ 14 ULTRA LOW-PROFILE PTA BALLOON CATHETER OF A LESION IN THE RIGHT ANTERIOR TIBIAL. THE BALLOON BURST AT NOMINAL PRESSURE. A COOK PEDAL ACCESS "2.9FR" SHEATH AND AN INFLATION DEVICE WERE ALSO IN USE. THERE WAS NO VESSEL CALCIFICATION. ALTHOUGH REQUESTED, THE FOLLOWING IS NOT KNOWN: IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE VESSEL WAS TORTUROUS OR ANGLED; IT IS UNKNOWN HOW MANY TIMES THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED OR HOW LONG EACH INFLATION WAS.; IT IS NOT KNOWN WHAT TYPE OF CONTRAST WAS USED; IT IS NOT KNOWN HOW THE BALLOON WAS REMOVED OR IF IT WAS REMOVED WITH THE SHEATH.; IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE BALLOON RUPTURED CIRCUMFERENTIALLY OR LONGITUDINALLY. THE BALLOON WAS NOT INFLATED INSIDE A STENT PRIOR TO RUPTURE. A NEW DEVICE WAS OPENED AND USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, A PORTION OF THE BALLOON DID NOT REMAIN IN THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE OR EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8583723 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 12, 2019Material Separation; Material Separation

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED NOTING THAT NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS APPLIED WHILE ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE BALLOON CATHETER.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8509887 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 17, 2017Burst Container or Vessel

    THE REPORTED INFORMATION INDICATED THAT THE BALLOON BURST LONGITUDINALLY BELOW RATE BURST PRESSURE. THE DEVICE WAS BEING USED IN THE PERONEAL ARTERY AND BURST UPON REACHING 14 ATMOSPHERES. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A COMPETITORS¿ CORONARY BALLOON. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN IN THE PATIENT¿S BODY, NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE REQUIRED AND THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6716682 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page