Advance G30949Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Advance, 18LP Low Profile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2
All models of Advance (206)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10827002309491), received between Dec 9, 2019 and Dec 9, 2019 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 9, 2019Material Rupture; Material Separation; Material Rupture; Material Separation
AS REPORTED, DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE OF THE POPLITEAL ARTERY INVOLVING A PATIENT WITH A HISTORY OF PERIPHERAL ARTERY DISEASE, AN ADVANCE 18 LP LOW PROFILE BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURED CIRCUMFERENTIALLY AND SEPARATED. A 6 FRENCH COOK ANSEL SHEATH WAS USED AND AN UNKNOWN INFLATION DEVICE WAS USED TO INFLATE THE BALLOON ONE TIME USING OMNIPAQUE CONTRAST, TO APPROXIMATELY SIX ATMOSPHERES, WHEN THE BALLOON RUPTURED AND SEPARATED. REPORTEDLY, A PRE-DILATION WITH ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S BALLOON OCCURRED PRIOR TO USING THE COMPLAINT DEVICE. THE ANATOMY WAS REPORTED TO BE HEAVILY CALCIFIED, AND THE ABOVE-THE-KNEE POPLITEAL LESION WAS APPROXIMATELY 99% OCCLUDED. TORTUOSITY WAS NOT REPORTED. THE DEVICE WAS NOT INFLATED INSIDE A STENT PRIOR TO RUPTURE. THE DISTAL END OF THE BALLOON REMAINED IN THE PATIENT, AS THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO REMOVE IT. THE PHYSICIAN STENTED THE BALLOON IN PLACE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Code Available
MAUDE report 9437629 ↗
Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices
- Coyote™ ES H74939135152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal879 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135204010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal585 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135202010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal437 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135304010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal384 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135404010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal293 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939134152010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal279 reports
- Coyote™ H74939185202210Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal200 reports
- Coyote™ ES H74939135254010Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal127 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page