Skip to content

Zilver 518 G31439Recalls & reported problems

Cook Ireland Ltd · Zilver 518 Biliary Stent · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Zilver 518 (20)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002314396), received between Jul 18, 2019 and Mar 19, 2025 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 1 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem2
  • Off-Label Use2
  • Activation Problem1
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 19, 2025Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use

    A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED DUE TO COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION ON 8 JUL 2025.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21643310 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 20, 2024Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use

    THE DOCTOR WAS DEPLOYING THE STENT IN THE INTERNAL ILIAC. HE REMOVED THE SAFETY TAB AND STARTING TO PULL BACK ON THE DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM. THEY HEARD A SNAP BUT KEPT RETRACTING THE DEPLOYMENT SHEATH. AFTER THEY DEPLOYED THE STENT, THEY REALIZED THE SHEATH NEVER RETRACTED AND THE STENT WAS STILL INCAPSULATED IN THAT SHEATH RATHER THAN THE VESSEL. THEY PULLED OUT THE STENT DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM AND EVERYTHING CAME OUT OKAY. THE STENT SHOULD STILL BE IN THE SHEATH WHEN Y¿ALL REVIEW THE PARTS. PATIENT OUTCOME: THEY PULLED OUT THE STENT DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM AND EVERYTHING CAME OUT OKAY. NO PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED SG 23FEB2024. PATIENT/EVENT INFO - NOTES: THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED VIA EMAIL ON 22FEB2024. SG 23FEB2024 1. WILL THE FACILITY BE REPORTING THIS TO A GOVERNMENT AGENCY (FDA, COMPETENT AUTHORITY, ETC.) NO 2. USAGE OF PRODUCT (PLEASE SELECT ONLY ONE BELOW): A. INITIAL USE OF DEVICE- INITIAL USE IS CORRECT. 3. WAS PRODUCT REPROCESSED FOR REUSE PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE? NO. 4. DID THE PRODUCT REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT? A. CAN YOU PROVIDE ANY PATIENT INFORMATION (AGE, WEIGHT, GENDER, PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS)? UNKNOWN. B. WHAT TYPE OF PROCEDURE WAS B

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18939860 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 2, 2022Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation Problem; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Activation Problem

    AS INITIALLY REPORTED TO CUSTOMER RELATIONS: A MALE PATIENT OF UNSPECIFIED AGE UNDERWENT AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE IN WHICH THE ZILVER 518 BILIARY SELF-EXPANDING STENT, G31439, WAS USED. THE STENT AND CATHETER WAS FLUSHED AND ONCE THE PRODUCT WAS OVER THE WIRE, INTRODUCED INTO PATIENT AND READY TO DEPLOY, THEY [THE END USER] CLAIM THE STENT WOULD NOT OPEN. THEY [THE END USER] REMOVED THE PRODUCT AT THIS TIME. REQUESTED 11AUG2022. TH 1. DID ANY UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY? NO IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. 2. WAS THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZED OR WAS THERE PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION? 3. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. 4. DID THE PRODUCT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES? IF YES, PLEASE SPECIFY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES AND PROVIDE DETAILS. 5. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. 6. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EFFECTS? NO. PLEASE SPECIFY ADVERSE EFFECTS AND PROVIDE DETAILS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15345048 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 18, 2019Fracture; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Fracture; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem

    UPON TRYING TO USE STENT, SHEATH DISCONNECTED FROM THE DEPLOYMENT HANDLE. THE DEVICE WAS ABLE TO BE DEPLOYED, BUT THE SHEATH WAS HELD MANUALLY. THE DEVICE WAS PLACED IN PROXIMAL POPLITEAL INSTEAD OF DISTAL POPLITEAL/ANTERIOR TIBIAL.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8802835 ↗

Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices

All CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page