Skip to content

Advance G34374Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Advance, 35LP Low Profile PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter · Class 2

All models of Advance (206)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002343747), received between Aug 24, 2016 and Aug 24, 2016 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque2
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 24, 2016Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORT THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY THE RADIOLOGIST INFLATED THE BALLOON TO 5 ATM AND THE BALLOON BURST, POSSIBLY CIRCUMFERENTIALLY (MDR # 1820334-2016-00838). WHEN THE RADIOLOGIST TRIED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON CATHETER IT SEEMED STUCK AND THEN A PIECE BROKE OFF THE END, REMAINING INSIDE THE PATIENT. A LARGER SHEATH AND SNARE WERE USED TO CAPTURE THE PIECE OF BALLOON THAT WAS IN THE PATIENT ANATOMY (MDR # 1820334-2016-00820). A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE ALLEGED INCIDENT REPORTEDLY PROLONGED THE PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 5900608 ↗
  • InjuryAug 24, 2016Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORT THAT DURING AN ANGIOPLASTY THE RADIOLOGIST INFLATED THE BALLOON TO 5 ATM AND THE BALLOON BURST, POSSIBLY CIRCUMFERENTIALLY (MDR # 1820334-2016-00838). WHEN THE RADIOLOGIST TRIED TO REMOVE THE BALLOON CATHETER IT SEEMED STUCK AND THEN A PIECE BROKE OFF THE END, REMAINING INSIDE THE PATIENT. A LARGER SHEATH AND SNARE WERE USED TO CAPTURE THE PIECE OF BALLOON THAT WAS IN THE PATIENT ANATOMY (MDR # 1820334-2016-00820). A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE ALLEGED INCIDENT REPORTEDLY PROLONGED THE PROCEDURE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 5900491 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page