Zilver 518 G36048Recalls & reported problems
Cook Ireland Ltd · Zilver 518 Biliary Stent · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Zilver 518 (20)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10827002360485), received between Sep 21, 2017 and Aug 19, 2022 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Off-Label Use” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Off-Label Use3
- Stretched1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 19, 2022Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
WHEN PINNED AND PULLED, THE STENT FLOWERED OUT, BUT THE LAST 1 CM OF THE STENT WOULD NOT EXIT OUT. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY PULLED BACK TO THE HUB. THE STENT SHOULD HAVE COMPLETELY DEPLOYED AT THIS POINT. THE USER PULLED THE WHOLE DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM BACK TO DEPLOY STENT IN TARGET SITE. THIS OCCURRED WITH EVERY STENT USED IN THIS CASE: (B)(4) ¿ G43773, LOT NUMBER C1753166, (B)(4) ¿ G43773, LOT NUMBER C1794186, (B)(4) ¿ G43773, LOT NUMBER C1633402, (B)(4) ¿ G36048, LOT NUMBER C1778086, (B)(4) ¿ G36048, LOT NUMBER C1810418. DID ANY UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY? NO. WAS THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZED OR WAS THERE PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION? NO. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. DID THE PRODUCT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES? NO. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EFFECTS? NA. AT WHAT STAGE OF THE PROCEDURE DID THE COMPLAINT OCCUR? STENT PLACEMENT DETAILS OF ACCESS SHEATH USED (NAME, FR SIZE, LENGTH)? 5 FR TERUMO SLENDER SHEATH DID THE PATIENT REQUIR
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15257670 ↗MalfunctionAug 19, 2022Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
WHEN PINNED AND PULLED, THE STENT FLOWERED OUT, BUT THE LAST 1 CM OF THE STENT WOULD NOT EXIT OUT. THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY PULLED BACK TO THE HUB. THE STENT SHOULD HAVE COMPLETELY DEPLOYED AT THIS POINT. THE USER PULLED THE WHOLE DEPLOYMENT SYSTEM BACK TO DEPLOY STENT IN TARGET SITE. THIS OCCURRED WITH EVERY STENT USED IN THIS CASE: (B)(4)¿ G43773, LOT NUMBER C1753166. (B)(4)¿ G43773, LOT NUMBER C1794186. (B)(4)¿ G43773, LOT NUMBER C1633402. (B)(4)¿ G36048, LOT NUMBER C1778086. (B)(4)¿ G36048, LOT NUMBER C1810418. DID ANY UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY? NO. WAS THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZED OR WAS THERE PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION? NO. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. DID THE PRODUCT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES? NO. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EFFECTS? NA. AT WHAT STAGE OF THE PROCEDURE DID THE COMPLAINT OCCUR? STENT PLACEMENT. DETAILS OF ACCESS SHEATH USED (NAME, FR SIZE, LENGTH)? 5 FR TERUMO SLENDER SHEATH. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE A
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15257627 ↗MalfunctionJul 1, 2022Off-Label Use; Off-Label Use
PER REP - (B)(6) 2022 - THE STENT WOULD NOT CROSS THE LESION. PER REP - (B)(6) 2022 - HOW WAS THE PROCEDURE COMPLETED? BY UTILIZING A COMPETITOR STENT DID ANY UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY? NO. IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. WAS THE PATIENT HOSPITALIZED OR WAS THERE PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. DID THE PRODUCT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES? NO IF YES, PLEASE SPECIFY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES AND PROVIDE DETAILS. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE? NO. HAS THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE PRODUCT CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE ADVERSE EFFECTS? NO. PLEASE SPECIFY ADVERSE EFFECTS AND PROVIDE DETAILS. ZIV5/ZIV6/ZFV6: ARE IMAGES OF THE DEVICE OR PROCEDURE AVAILABLE? N/A, YES, NO-NO. AT WHAT STAGE OF THE PROCEDURE DID THE COMPLAINT OCCUR? UNPACKING OR PREPARATION OF THE DEVICE, INSERTION, STENT PLACEMENT, REMOVING THE INTRODUCER. INSERTION. DETAILS OF ACCESS SHEATH USED (NAME, FR SIZE, LENGTH)? WHAT WAS THE TARGET LOCATION FOR THE STENT? CAROTID. WAS THE PRODU
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14883841 ↗MalfunctionSep 21, 2017Stretched; Stretched
THE PHYSICIAN DEPLOYED THE STENT AND AFTER DEPLOYMENT, THEY WENT TO PLACE THE BALLOON; HOWEVER, THEY REALIZED THE STENT PLACED WAS THE INCORRECT SIZE FROM WHAT THE PACKAGING SAID. SHOULD HAVE BEEN A 5.0-80 BUT WAS A 5.0-100. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITH THE STENT SUCCESSFULLY. CONSERVATIVE INTERPRETATION OF 'STENT ELONGATION' UNTIL CLARIFICATION IS RECEIVED; INVESTIGATION IS STILL IN PROGRESS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6882059 ↗
Other CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC devices
- Hurricane™ RX M00545900Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls1 death705 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171060470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC384 reports
- CRE™ PRO M00558710Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC1 recall284 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545920Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls211 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171070470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC265 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171050470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC212 reports
- Hurricane™ RX M00545940Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC2 recalls109 reports
- MUSTANG™ H74939171100470Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, BILIARY, DIAGNOSTIC203 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page