Hall 50 PRO7300BRecalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10845854040041), received between Sep 2, 2021 and Jul 21, 2025 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionJul 21, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE DEVICE, PRO7300B HALL 50 OSCILLATING SAW BATTERY HANDPIECE WAS BEING USED ON (B)(6) 2025 DURING AN OSTEOTOMY AND "¿THE OSCILLATOR HEAD OF THE MAIN BODY WAS CUT OFF DURING OSTEOTOMY USING THIS HALL 50 OSCILLATOR.¿ PER FURTHER ASSESSMENT IT WAS REPORTED THAT "WHILE CUTTING THE DISTAL FEMUR, THE TIP BROKE OFF AND SOME FINE IRON-LIKE PARTICLES FELL ONTO THE BONE. I HEARD THAT THE WOUND WAS THOROUGHLY CLEANSED.¿ THERE WAS NO IMPACT OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT OR USER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH AN ALTERNATE ¿BACKUP INSTRUMENT¿. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 22553671 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 19, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

  THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THEIR CUSTOMER THAT THE PRO7300B, HALL50 OSCILLATING SAW BATTERY HPC WAS BEING USED DURING A TKA PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2023 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED ¿THIS HANDPIECE SNAPPED IN TWO BETWEEN THE HEAD AND GRIP DURING OSTEOTOMY.¿. FURTHER ASSESSMENT QUESTIONING FOUND THAT THE FRAGMENT WAS RETRIEVED WITH THE USE A ¿FORCEP-LIKE INSTRUMENT¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF A BACKUP POWER TOOL AND THERE WAS NO DELAY REPORTED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT OR USER. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS ¿THERE HAVE BEEN NO REPORTS OF ADVERSE EVENTS¿. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 17349515 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 2, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

  THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE, PRO7300B, WAS BEING USED DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON APPROXIMATELY THE(B)(6) 2021 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED SAFETY SWITCH FELL OFF INTO PATIENT, WAS RETRIEVED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT. FURTHER INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED THROUGH THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE; HOWEVER, THE REPRESENTATIVE HAS REPORTED THAT THE CONTACT IS NOT ANSWERING ANY CALLS. TO DATE WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY FURTHER INFORMATION FROM THE FACILITY. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 12412917 ↗