Skip to content

Edge SD90EWCTE-FTRecalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · FirmTip;Extended Working Channel;90 Catheter · Class 2

All models of Edge (43)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10884521199590), received between Nov 27, 2024 and Nov 27, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Pneumothorax1
  • Respiratory Failure1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE LITERATURE, A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY COMPARED THE DIAGNOSTIC YIELD OF ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATION BRONCHOSCOPY (ENB) AND SHAPE-SENSING ROBOTIC-ASSISTED BRONCHOSCOPY (SSRAB)-GUIDED CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY CBCT. A TOTAL OF 92 PATIENTS UNDERWENT ENB-CBCT AND 93 PATIENTS UNDERWENT SSRAB-CBCT FOR BIOPSY OF PULMONARY NODULES BETWEEN JULY 2020 AND MAY 2023. SUPERDIMENSION WAS USED IN THE ENB GROUP WITH AN EXTENDED WORKING CHANNEL CATHETER. THE NEEDLE OR A COMPETITOR DEVICE WAS USED FOR FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION, FOLLOWED BY A COMPETITOR BIOPSY FORCEPS AND CYTOLOGY BRUSH TO ACQUIRE TISSUE. ALL PATIENTS UNDERWENT ENDOBRONCHIAL ULTRASOUND (EBUS)-GUIDED TRANSBRONCHIAL NEEDLE ASPIRATION FOR MEDIASTINAL STAGING FOLLOWING NAVIGATIONAL BRONCHOSCOPY. COMPLICATIONS INCLUDED:  PNEUMOTHORAX IN 2(2.1%) PATIENTS, ONE PATIENT HAD HYPOXIC RESPIRATORY FAILURE AND TWO (2.1%) PATIENTS HAD HEMODYNAMIC INSTABILITY. INTERVENTIONS WERE NOT REPORTED. CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY-GUIDED SHAPE-SENSING ROBOTIC BRONCHOSCOPY VS. ELECTROMAGNETIC NAVIGATION BRONCHOSCOPY FOR PULMONARY NODULES 10.21037/JTD-24-178.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Pneumothorax; Respiratory Failure

    MAUDE report 20801238 ↗

Other System, x-ray, tomography, computed devices

All System, x-ray, tomography, computed devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page