Skip to content

V-Loc VLOCN0804Recalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · PBT Non Absorbable Wound Closure Device, CV-23, 1x Blue Strand · Class 2 · Implant

All models of V-Loc (18)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521214712), received between Oct 3, 2023 and Sep 19, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 19, 2024Break; Break

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A ROBOT-ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHILE SUTURING THE PETERSEN'S DEFECT, THE CENTRAL PART OF THE SUTURE WAS DAMAGED. THE SUTURE REMAINED IN THE TISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20257205 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 3, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL GASTRECTOMY PROCEDURE, WHEN IT WAS TRIED TO CLOSE THE PETERSEN DEFECT BY HOLDING IT WITH A NEEDLE HOLDER, THE THREAD CAME OUT OF THE NEEDLE. THE THREAD DROPPED INTO THE PATIENT'S ABDOMINAL CAVITY, BUT IT WAS IMMEDIATELY PICKED UP AND PUT OUTSIDE. A NEW SUTURE WAS TAKEN OUT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17862965 ↗

Other SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE devices

All SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page