Skip to content

Tri-Staple 2.0 SIG60AVMRecalls & reported problems

Covidien LP · Intelligent Reload;Vascular/Medium Intelligent Reload;For use with Signia (TM) stapling system · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tri-Staple 2.0 (37)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521808980), received between Jul 22, 2022 and Aug 24, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Entrapment of Device” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 2 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 2 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
  • Entrapment of Device2
  • Human-Device Interface Problem1
  • Misfire1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6
  • Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding2
  • Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50420866 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    It was reported that during a robotic laparoscopic left nephrectomy, there was a bleeding from the staple line was reported after firing the reload. The surgeon placed a weck clip at the bleeding site.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50420845 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 27, 2026Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, THE RELOAD WOULD NOT OPEN AFTER SUCCESSFUL FIRING. THE DEVICE WAS LOCKED ON THE TISSUE AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE RELOAD WAS ABLE TO BE REMOVED SAFELY, AND NO INTERVENTION WAS DONE OR REQUIRED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25311096 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 31, 2026Entrapment of Device

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY, THE DEVICE LOCKED ON TISSUE AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED WHEN THE STAPLER WAS FIRED OVER THE APPENDIX FOR REMOVAL. THE STAPLER JAWS WERE GENTLY OPENED WITH A HEMOSTAT TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24747384 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Misfire; Misfire

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING A SIDE-TO-SIDE ANASTOMOSIS DURING FUNCTIONAL END-TO-END ANASTOMOSIS DURING COLON RESECTION, THE FIRING ADVANCED FOR ABOUT ONE CM, AND THE SURGEON INTENTIONALLY STOPPED TO CHECK FOR ENTANGLEMENT. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO RESUME FIRING, BUT FIRING COULD NOT BE PERFORMED. THE ASSISTANT PHYSICIAN REPORTED THAT SOME BUTTON WAS TOUCHED DURING THE CHECK AFTER FIRING WAS STOPPED. THE KNIFE WAS RETURNED, AND A NEW CARTRIDGE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20034539 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POSTOPERATIVELY, OF A LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS ON THE STOMACH AND INTESTINE, THE PATIENT HAD DIGESTIVE BLEEDING. THE ISSUE OCCURRED ON THREE RELOADS. THE PATIENT WAS PUT UNDER OBSERVATION.

    Patient problems: Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding

    MAUDE report 19495322 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 6, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, POST-OPERATIVE A LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS, THE PATIENT HAD DIGESTIVE BLEEDING FROM ALL THREE DEVICE. THE PATIENT WAS PLACED UNDER OBSERVATION.

    Patient problems: Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage

    MAUDE report 19479816 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 22, 2022Human-Device Interface Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Human-Device Interface Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, DURING THE LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS, WHEN CREATING THE STOMACH POUCH, AND WITH THE SIDE TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS, THE STAPLER FIRED BUT THE 2 RELOADS CANNOT BE REMOVED FROM THE 2 ADAPTERS AFTER BEING USED. TWO NEW ADAPTER SETS HAD TO BE OPENED AND RECONNECTED TO THE HANDLE. SURGICAL TIME WAS EXTENDED FOR 30 MINUTES OR MORE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15089266 ↗

Other Staple, implantable devices

All Staple, implantable devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page