EndoFLIP EF-325NRecalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · Endolumenal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe · Class 2
All models of EndoFLIP (8)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 17
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521809420), received between Feb 16, 2023 and May 14, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 15 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination /Decontamination Problem” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem7
- Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate2
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Calibration Problem1
- Environmental Particulates1
- Gradient Increase1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions15
- Laceration(s)1
- Perforation of Esophagus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 14, 2026
ENDOFLIP PROBE AND SYRINGE FAILED THE PRE-CHECK.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25169066 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2026Environmental Particulates
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER HAD BLACK DEBRIS IN THE SYRINGE OUT OF THE BOX. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. MEDTRONIC'S INITIAL EVALUATION OF THE INCIDENT DEVICE FOUND BLACK PARTICULATE MATTER SUSPENDED IN THE SALINE SOLUTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25163818 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE BLACK DEBRIS IN THE SYRINGE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURN DEVICE CONFIRMED A MANUFACTURING FAULT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE OBSERVED CONDITION WAS DETERMINED TO BE A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25163810 ↗MalfunctionMay 13, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER HAD BLACK DEBRIS IN THE SYRINGE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURN DEVICE CONFIRMED A MANUFACTURING FAULT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE OBSERVED CONDITION WAS DETERMINED TO BE A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25163804 ↗MalfunctionApr 13, 2026Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
EVENT DESCRIPTION IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER FAILED THE PRE-USE CHECK AND WAS ATTEMPTED TWICE. ANOTHER CATHETER WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM. THE REPORTED CONDITION WAS NOT CONFIRMED. FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURN DEVICE CONFIRMED A UNREPORTED ISSUE. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE OBSERVED CONDITION WAS DETERMINED TO BE A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24860005 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN FOUR SYRINGES FOR THE CATHETERS WERE LOOKED AT, IT APPEARED AS IT HAD DEBRIS IN THE SYRINGES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURN DEVICE CONFIRMED A MANUFACTURING FAULT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE OBSERVED CONDITION WAS DETERMINED TO BE A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24800838 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN FOUR SYRINGES FOR THE CATHETERS WERE LOOKED AT, IT APPEARED AS IT HAD DEBRIS IN THE SYRINGES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURN DEVICE CONFIRMED A MANUFACTURING FAULT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE OBSERVED CONDITION WAS DETERMINED TO BE A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24800815 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN FOUR SYRINGES FOR THE CATHETERS WERE LOOKED AT, IT APPEARED AS IT HAD DEBRIS IN THE SYRINGES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURN DEVICE CONFIRMED A MANUFACTURING FAULT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE OBSERVED CONDITION WAS DETERMINED TO BE A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24800803 ↗MalfunctionApr 7, 2026Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN FOUR SYRINGES FOR THE CATHETERS WERE LOOKED AT, IT APPEARED AS IT HAD DEBRIS IN THE SYRINGES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURN DEVICE CONFIRMED A MANUFACTURING FAULT. THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE OBSERVED CONDITION WAS DETERMINED TO BE A RESULT OF A MANUFACTURING ACTIVITY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24800784 ↗MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Inflation Problem
BALLOON CATHETER FAILED TO INFLATE- FAILED TEST. NEW CATHETER BROUGHT INTO PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23736198 ↗MalfunctionJun 14, 2024Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate; Device Difficult to Program or Calibrate
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE CATHETER WAS USED TO TEST THE SYSTEM AFTER THE COMMUNICATION FAILURE. THE CATHETER FAILED TO PRE CHECK ON SENSOR 11. TRIED TO PRE CHECK TWICE AND THE SECOND CATHETER PASSED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19537572 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE TIP OF THE CATHETER CAUSED A TEAR IN THE HYPO LARYNX RIGHT ABOVE THE ESOPHAGUS. THIS WAS A 3RD TIME REDO PROCEDURE, SO THE ABDOMINAL/MEDIASTINAL PORTION WAS MORE COMPLEX BUT UNRELATED TO THE INJURY THAT OCCURRED. THE PATIENT DID REQUIRE A PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION BUT NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES (WAS MANAGED NONOPERATIVELY). NOTHING UNUSUAL ABOUT THE CATHETER WAS NOTICED. THE PATIENT IS NOW STABLE AND DOING WELL.
Patient problems: Laceration(s)
MAUDE report 19094003 ↗MalfunctionSep 13, 2023
ENDOFLIP WOULD NOT CALIBRATE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17735370 ↗MalfunctionJun 28, 2023Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
NURSE WAS PRIMING THE ENDOFLIP CATHETER; SHE LEFT THE CAP ON, AND THE CATHETER FAILED TESTING DUE TO THIS ERROR. PATIENT WAS NOT IN THE ROOM YET. A NEW CATHETER WAS USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17216011 ↗MalfunctionMay 25, 2023Calibration Problem
PROBE DID NOT CALIBRATE CORRECTLY. FOUND PRIOR TO PATIENT USE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17001775 ↗MalfunctionMar 21, 2023Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Pressure Problem; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Pressure Problem
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE CATHETER INFLATED TO 50ML, PRESSURE 4.7MMHG AND DEFLATED TO 0ML, PRESSURE -5.5MMHG. ALTHOUGH MMHG POST DEFLATION WAS -5.5MMHG, SURGEON PROCEEDED WITH THE CATHETER. THE SURGEON IMMEDIATELY FELT THE DI WAS OFF. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16585755 ↗InjuryFeb 16, 2023Gradient Increase; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Gradient Increase; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
ACCORDING TO THE REPORTER, THE SURGEON REPORTED JUMPS IN DISTENSIBILITY. PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED ON AN ACHALASIA PATIENT WITH AN INITIAL DI OF 1.2 WHICH THEN JUMPED TO 5. BASED ON THE DI OF 5, THE SURGEON MADE A CLINICAL ASSESSMENT NOT TO PERFORM A MYOTOMY AND ENDED UP PERFORATING THE PATIENT DURING A SEPARATE FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT WAS STILL IN THE HOSPITAL DUE TO THIS ADVERSE EVENT.
Patient problems: Perforation of Esophagus
MAUDE report 16389231 ↗
Other SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL) devices
- ManoScan 3890Given Imaging, Inc. · SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)90 reports
- Solar GI LGI H20, Trolley system G3-6Medical Measurement Systems B.V. · SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)1 recall3 reports
- Solar GI HRM H20, 24p, Trolley system G3-8Medical Measurement Systems B.V. · SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)1 recall2 reports
- Solar GI HRM H2O, 36p, Trolley system G3-12Medical Measurement Systems B.V. · SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)1 recall1 report
- Endoflip RFG-EF100Covidien LP · SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)1 recall0 reports
- Zvu® ZVU-3Diversatek Healthcare, Inc. · System, Gastrointestinal Motility (Electrical)1 recall0 reports
- Solar GI HRAM H2O, 24p, Trolley system G3-14Medical Measurement Systems B.V. · SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)1 recall0 reports
- Solar GI HRM H20, 24p, Compact Pole system G3-7Medical Measurement Systems B.V. · SYSTEM, GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY (ELECTRICAL)1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page