EEA TRIEEAXL25XTORVILRecalls & reported problems
Covidien LP · CIR STPLR TRIEEAXL25XT BLK wTRISTP nORVL · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10884521827660), received between Jan 22, 2026 and Sep 29, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Break1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- Failure to Anastomose2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Tissue Breakdown1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
It was reported that four days postoperatively, an atypical anastomotic leak occurred. No intraoperative issues were reported; the tissue donuts were reported as fine, with no abnormal tissue or tension observed. Additional surgery was performed.
Patient problems: Failure to Anastomose; Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 50937283 ↗InjurySep 29, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
Patient problems: Failure to Anastomose
MAUDE report 50935454 ↗MalfunctionJan 22, 2026Break; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN IVOR LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY, THE SUTURE WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE FROM THE ORVIL (ORAL ANVIL) PRIOR TO FIRING. EXCESSIVE FORCE WAS REQUIRED TO ATTEMPT REMOVAL, AND THE SUTURE WOULD NOT MOVE DESPITE MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS, INCLUDING MOVING THE ANVIL SIDE TO SIDE, IN AND OUT, AND TWISTING. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO FIRE THE STAPLER WITH THE SUTURE POTENTIALLY IN THE STAPLE LINE. AFTER FIRING, THE SUTURE REMAINED ON THE ANVIL. UPON REMOVAL OF THE STAPLER, SUTURE PIECES WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE CHEST CAVITY, WITH A TOTAL OF THREE PIECES IDENTIFIED: THE SUTURE REEL AND TWO ADDITIONAL PIECES. THE PROCEDURE WAS EXTENDED BY 15 MINUTES DUE TO THESE ISSUES. THE PATIENT WAS ALIVE WITH NO INJURY, AND WAS REPORTEDLY RECOVERING AS EXPECTED ON POSTOPERATIVE DAY TWO.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24152272 ↗
Other Staple, implantable devices
- Endo GIA EGIA60AMTCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE19 deaths10,680 reports
- Endo GIA Ultra EGIAUSTNDCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE5 deaths9,730 reports
- Signia SIGPHANDLECovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE1 recall3 deaths5,356 reports
- ECHELON FLEX PSEE60AEthicon Endo-Surgery, LLC · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE1 recall13 deaths3,294 reports
- Endo GIA Ultra EGIAUSHORTCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE2 deaths3,011 reports
- Endo GIA EGIA45AMTCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE10 deaths2,965 reports
- Endo GIA Ultra EGIAUXLCovidien LP · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE2,909 reports
- ENDOPATH ATS45Ethicon Endo-Surgery, LLC · STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE2 deaths2,046 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.