Skip to content

NA 03.100.107Recalls & reported problems

Synthes GmbH · ALUMINUM BLUNT PELVIC RETRACTOR · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10886982071057), received between Jul 30, 2020 and Oct 4, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break3
  • Crack1
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 4, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE IS WORN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 20372913 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 15, 2023Break; Break

    DEVICE REPORT FROM AUSTRALIA REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2023 DURING INCOMING LOAN KIT INSPECTION, THE TIP OF THE INSTRUMENT IN QUESTION WAS FOUND WITH A HOLE IN IT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT OR PROCEDURE INTERACTION. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. THIS REPORT IS FOR AN ALUMINUM BLUNT PELVIC RETRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18141077 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 6, 2021Crack; Device-Device Incompatibility; Crack; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, UNABLE TO STERILIZE/ASSEMBLE THE MALLEABLE RETRACTOR. CHIPPING AND CRACKING ON INSTRUMENTS. UNABLE TO USE. THIS COMPLAINT INVOLVES TEN(10) DEVICES. THIS REPORT IS FOR (1) ALUMINUM BLUNT PELVIC RETRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 4 OF 10 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12937324 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 12, 2021Break; Break

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(6) REPORTS AN EVENT AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THE RADIOLUCENT PELVIC RETRACTOR WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR PROCEDURE INVOLVEMENT REPORTED. THIS REPORT IS FOR A PELVIC RETRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12151026 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 30, 2020Break; Break

    DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY (HTO) SURGERY. DURING THE SURGERY, THE RADIOLUSCENT PELVIC RETRACTOR WAS USED FOR POSTERIOR TISSUE PROTECTION DURING OSTEOTOMY BY HTO. THE RADIOLUSCENT PELVIC RETRACTOR WAS CUT WITH THE BONE WHILE USING AN OSCILLATING SAW, WHICH MANUFACTURED BY A COMPETITOR. THE CUT RADIOLUSCENT PELVIC RETRACTOR WAS NOT FOUND UNDER FLUOROSCOPY, THE SURGEON FOUND IT AFTER RETURNING TO THE INSTRUMENT TABLE. THE SURGERY WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED WITHOUT ANY DELAY. THE SURGEON COMMENTED THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO PROBLEM BECAUSE THE METAL POWDER WAS WASHED ENOUGH SO THAT IT WOULD NOT REMAIN IN THE PATIENT¿S BODY. CONCOMITANT DEVICE REPORTED: OSCILLATING SAW (PART NUMBER UNKNOWN, LOT UNKNOWN, QUANTITY 1). THIS REPORT INVOLVES ONE (1) ALUMINUM BLUNT PELVIC RETRACTOR. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10344980 ↗

Other RETRACTOR devices

All RETRACTOR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page