Skip to content

Kendall 31469219 (UDI 20192253017455)Recalls & reported problems

Cardinal Health 200, LLC · Kendall 1410Z Adult Multi-Function Defibrillation Electrodes · Class 3

All models of Kendall (31)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20192253017455), received between Jan 8, 2024 and Jan 25, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Sparking” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 2 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Sparking2
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1

Patient problems

  • Erythema1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 25, 2024Loss of or Failure to Bond; Sparking; Loss of or Failure to Bond; Sparking

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS SHOCKED THREE TIMES SUCCESSFULLY AND ON THE FOURTH SHOCK, ARCING AND SPARKS CAME FROM THE PAD. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PAD WAS POSSIBLY COMING OFF/NOT ADHERING WELL ON THAT FOURTH SHOCK. SHE DID SUSTAIN A SMALL AREA OF REDNESS TO HER SKIN AND WHEN CHECKING ON HER AT THE TRANSFER FACILITY, IT WAS NOTED TO STILL BE JUST RED WITH NO BLISTERING OR ANYTHING MORE SEVERE. THE PATIENT HAD NO CHEST HAIR AND WAS NOT DIAPHORETIC. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED.

    Patient problems: Erythema

    MAUDE report 18579942 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 8, 2024Sparking; Sparking

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THEY HAD A SCHEDULED CARDIOVERSION THAT USED A SET OF THE 31469219 PADS AND WHEN THE FIRST SHOCK WAS APPLIED, STAFF SAW A SPARK COME FROM THE PADS. THEY THOUGHT MAYBE THE PAD WAS COMING LOOSE AT THE BOTTOM WHERE THE CORDS ARE INSERTED, BUT THAT WASN¿T NOTICED UNTIL AFTER A SECOND SET WAS REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGING AND NOTED TO LOOK SIMILAR WITH THE LOOSE SEAL AT THE BOTTOM. THE SPARK DID NOT COME FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE PAD JUST TO MAKE THAT CLEAR. THEY SHAVED THE PATIENT, WHO WASN¿T REALLY TOO HAIRY ACCORDING TO NURSING STAFF AND APPLIED A THIRD SET OF PADS THAT DID WORK SUCCESSFULLY. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18468552 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page