Skip to content

Kendall 31319281 (UDI 20192253017721)Recalls & reported problems

Cardinal Health 200, LLC · Kendall 1310P Adult Multi-Function Defibrillation Electrodes · Class 3

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20192253017721), received between Nov 8, 2022 and Dec 21, 2023 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Analyze Signal” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Analyze Signal1
  • Failure to Sense1
  • Sparking1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 21, 2023Sparking; Sparking

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DEFIBRILLATOR ELECTRODE SPARKED DURING DEFIB. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, THERE WAS A DELAY IN SHOCK. THEY HAD TO APPLY ANOTHER SET OF PADS WHILE THE PATIENT WAS IN A LETHAL RHYTHM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18375386 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 24, 2023Failure to Analyze Signal; Failure to Analyze Signal

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT DURING A RESCUE OPERATION, THE ELECTRODE DID NOT DISSIPATE. IN A TEST WITH ANOTHER ELECTRODE FROM THE SAME BATCH, THERE WAS ALSO NO DERIVATION. PER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED, THERE WAS NO SIGNAL. THERE WAS NO MEDICAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED. A SECOND DEFIBRILLATION DEVICE WAS AVAILABLE AND USED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17610611 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 8, 2022Failure to Sense; Failure to Sense

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT A MALE PATIENT WAS HAVING A PROCEDURE IN THE CVOR. HE WAS BEING MONITORED BY THE ANESTHESIA MONITOR AND THE DEFIBRILLATOR. THE PATIENT CODED AND WAS SHOCKED ONE TIME AT 200. THEN HE WAS SHOCKED A SECOND TIME AT 300 AND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SECOND SHOCK, THE DEFIBRILLATOR WAS NO LONGER MONITORING. THE PATIENT WAS STILL BEING MONITORED BY THE ANESTHESIA MONITOR. PER THE CUSTOMER, THE PATIENT EXPIRED BUT IT WAS NOT DUE TO THE ELECTRODE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON (B)(6) 2022 STATED THAT THE PROCEDURE BEING DONE WAS VATS. THE MONITOR BEING USED WAS A LIFEPAK 20E. THE MONITOR WAS STILL ON AND FUNCTIONING WITH NO SIGNAL FROM THE PADS. THE PATIENT'S CAUSE OF DEATH WAS DUE TO SEVERE LUNG AND CARDIAC DISEASE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15756733 ↗

Other Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices

All Automated external defibrillators (non-wearable) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page