CONMED SCOPE SAVER 100429Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · CONMED SCOPE SAVER BITE BLOCK, 14 X 20 MM · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20653405050275), received between Feb 9, 2026 and Feb 10, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 10, 2026Material Fragmentation
A CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE 100429, CONMED SCOPE SAVER BITE BLOCK, 14 X 20 MM DEVICE WAS USED IN AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026, AND ¿IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE BITE BLOCK'S PERFORATED STRAP HAD A RESIDUAL FLAP OF MATERIAL THAT BECAME DISLODGED AND WAS FOUND INSIDE THE PATIENT. THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED TWICE IN ONE DAY.¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER ASSESSMENT FOUND "THAT THE INCIDENT OCCURRED WITH 2 SEPARATE PATIENTS. NO INSTRUMENTS WERE NEEDED TO RETRIEVE THE PIECE OF MATERIAL, AND NO BAD OUTCOMES OCCURRED". THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24302714 ↗MalfunctionFeb 9, 2026Material Fragmentation
A CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE 100429, CONMED SCOPE SAVER BITE BLOCK, 14 X 20 MM DEVICE WAS USED IN AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026, AND ¿IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE BITE BLOCK'S PERFORATED STRAP HAD A RESIDUAL FLAP OF MATERIAL THAT BECAME DISLODGED AND WAS FOUND INSIDE THE PATIENT. THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED TWICE IN ONE DAY.¿. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED IMPACT OR INJURY TO THE PATIENT. FURTHER ASSESSMENT FOUND "THAT THE INCIDENT OCCURRED WITH 2 SEPARATE PATIENTS. NO INSTRUMENTS WERE NEEDED TO RETRIEVE THE PIECE OF MATERIAL, AND NO BAD OUTCOMES OCCURRED". THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24291687 ↗
Other BRONCHOSCOPE ACCESSORY devices
- ViziShot 2 FLEX NA-U403SX-4019Gyrus ACMI, LLC · Bronchoscope accessory1 recall349 reports
- PeriView FLEX NA-403D-2021Gyrus ACMI, LLC · Bronchoscope accessory54 reports
- INSPIRA AIR BC1040AZAcclarent, Inc. · BRONCHOSCOPE ACCESSORY1 recall0 reports
- CRE Pulmonary M00550340Boston Scientific Corporation · BRONCHOSCOPE ACCESSORY26 reports
- CRE Pulmonary M00550350Boston Scientific Corporation · BRONCHOSCOPE ACCESSORY21 reports
- CRE Pulmonary M00550310Boston Scientific Corporation · BRONCHOSCOPE ACCESSORY21 reports
- CRE Pulmonary M00550330Boston Scientific Corporation · BRONCHOSCOPE ACCESSORY20 reports
- CRE Pulmonary M00550320Boston Scientific Corporation · BRONCHOSCOPE ACCESSORY15 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.