Skip to content

MAXI LD 4171660SRecalls & reported problems

Cordis US Corp. · MAXI LD 16X6 80CM · Class 2

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032002582), received between Nov 13, 2018 and Jan 19, 2024 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel6

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 19, 2024Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, THE BALLOONS OF A 16MM X 6CM MAXI LD PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER AND A 16MM X 4CM MAXI LD PTA BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURED WHEN DEPLOYED THROUGH AN UNKNOWN STENT. THERE WERE NO REPORT INJURIES TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED BUT WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE DEVICES WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18545341 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 16, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, THE MAXI LD 16X6 80CM BALLOON RUPTURED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURIES. THE DEVICE WAS STORED, HANDLED AND PREPPED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU).THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED NORMALLY BY MAINTAINING NEGATIVE PRESSURE. THERE WAS DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PROTECTIVE BALLOON COVER AND NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE STYLET OR ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THE SAME INDEFLATOR USED SUCCESSFULLY WITH OTHER DEVICES. THERE WERE NO KINKS OR OTHER DAMAGES NOTED PRIOR TO INSERTING THE PRODUCT INTO THE PATIENT. THE BALLOON INFLATED NORMALLY. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO NOMINAL PRESSURE. THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS REMOVED EASILY. THE TARGET LESION WAS A FIBROUS ILIAC VEIN. A NON-CORDIS BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8252638 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 17, 2018Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    DURING THE INITIAL INFLATION OF A MAXI LD BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. A SECOND BALLOON HAD TO BE USED TO FINISH THE ANGIOPLASTY.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8169637 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2018Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    DURING POST DILATION, IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOUR MAXI LD BALLOON CATHETER'S RUPTURE WITHIN THE STENT WHILE INFLATING WITHIN THE WALL STENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE USER FELT THAT THE BALLOONS WEREN'T WRAPPED AS WELL AS THEY USUALLY ARE AFTER THEY WERE REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE. THIS ACCOUNT USES THESE BALLOONS FREQUENTLY AND IS VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE DEVICES. THE USER DOES NOT FEEL THAT THE BALLOON GOT CAUGHT ON A STENT STRUT WITHIN THE STENT AND RUPTURED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8066759 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2018Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    DURING POST DILATION, IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOUR MAXI LD BALLOON CATHETER'S RUPTURE WITHIN THE STENT WHILE INFLATING WITHIN THE WALL STENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE USER FELT THAT THE BALLOONS WEREN'T WRAPPED AS WELL AS THEY USUALLY ARE AFTER THEY WERE REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE. THIS ACCOUNT USES THESE BALLOONS FREQUENTLY AND IS VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE DEVICES. THE USER DOES NOT FEEL THAT THE BALLOON GOT CAUGHT ON A STENT STRUT WITHIN THE STENT AND RUPTURED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8066394 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 13, 2018Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    DURING POST DILATION, IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOUR MAXI LD BALLOON CATHETER'S RUPTURE WITHIN THE STENT WHILE INFLATING WITHIN THE WALL STENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE USER FELT THAT THE BALLOONS WEREN'T WRAPPED AS WELL AS THEY USUALLY ARE AFTER THEY WERE REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE. THIS ACCOUNT USES THESE BALLOONS FREQUENTLY AND IS VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE DEVICES. THE USER DOES NOT FEEL THAT THE BALLOON GOT CAUGHT ON A STENT STRUT WITHIN THE STENT AND RUPTURED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8066285 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page