Skip to content

AVIATOR 4246040WRecalls & reported problems

Cordis US Corp. · AVIATOR PLUS .014 6.0X40 142CM · Class 2

All models of AVIATOR (19)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032005927), received between Mar 27, 2020 and Jun 14, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel3
  • Deflation Problem1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Stroke/CVA2
  • Extravasation1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Vasoconstriction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 14, 2024Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, A .014 6.0X40 AVIATOR WAS USED FOR CAROTID ARTERY STENTING (CAS) CASE, BUT THE CALCIFICATION OF THE LESION WAS SO SEVERE THAT THE BALLOON BURST DURING INFLATION. THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE USED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED; HOWEVER, THE INFORMATION WAS NOT OBTAINED AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19537706 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2021Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    DURING POST-DILATATION OF AN 8MM X 4MM PRECISE STENT WITH A 5MM X 4CM AVIATOR PLUS BALLOON CATHETER, THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY WITHDRAW THE BALLOON CATHETER. THE REMOVAL CAUSED MOVEMENT OF THE ANGIOGUARD EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE IN PLACE, RESULTING IN SEVERE SPASM OF THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY. IT ALSO RESULTED IN TRANSIENT THROMBOTIC OCCLUSION OF THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY AND THE PATIENT SUFFERED A STROKE. THERE WAS ALSO DIFFICULTY CLOSING AND REMOVING THE ANGIOGUARD DEVICE WHICH WAS REMOVED PARTIALLY COLLAPSED. THE THROMBUS WAS ASPIRATED. THE PATIENT SUFFERED A STROKE COMPLAINING OF RIGHT ARM AND LEG WEAKNESS, EXPRESSIVE DYSPHASIA AND CONFUSION. AN URGENT CT SCAN WAS PERFORMED AND THIS DID NOT REVEAL ANY ACUTE STROKE OR HAEMORRHAGE. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED CONSERVATIVELY BY THE RADIOLOGY NURSING STAFF AND MADE A SIGNIFICANT RECOVERY IN THE RADAR ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT UNIT (RADU). THE PATIENT WAS CONVERTED FROM ASPIRIN TO CLOPIDOGREL. THE PATIENTS ARM AND LEG WEAKNESS RESOLVED, HE WAS LESS CONFUSED BUT STILL HAD SOME RESIDUAL EXPRESSIVE DYSPHASIA. A LEFT CAROTID STENTING PROCEDURE WAS BEING PERFORMED. UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE A LEFT COMMON FEMORAL ARTER

    Patient problems: Stroke/CVA; Vasoconstriction

    MAUDE report 12778478 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 14, 2021Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, A .014¿ 6MM X 40MM X 142CM AVIATOR PLUS PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER, HOWEVER, IT RUPTURED AT 6 ATMOSPHERES (ATM). THEREFORE, THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH THE SAME SIZE SABER RX PTA BALLOON AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AS IT WAS DISCARDED DUE TO COVID-19.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12631846 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 10, 2020Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem

    AS REPORTED, A .014¿ 6.0 X 40 X 142CM AVIATOR PLUS PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER WAS FILLED WITH BLOOD AND WOULD NOT FULLY DEFLATE. THE BALLOON INFLATED NORMALLY BUT IT FILLED WITH BLOOD. THE BALLOON DEFLATED SOME BUT NOT FULLY. THEREFORE, THE ENTIRE SYSTEM WAS REMOVED, INCLUDING AN UNKNOWN FILTER BASKET AND UNKNOWN GUIDE TOGETHER, AS ONE UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER UNKNOWN DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY AND THE PATIENT REMAINS IN GOOD CONDITION. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS A CAROTID ARTERY INTERVENTION. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP, REMOVING THE PROTECTIVE BALLOON COVER, OR REMOVING THE STYLET OR ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THERE WERE NO KINKS OR OTHER DAMAGES NOTED PRIOR TO INSERTING THE PRODUCT THE PRODUCT INTO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE PREPPED NORMALLY. AN UNKNOWN INDEFLATOR WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY WITH OTHER DEVICES. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE/FRICTION WHILE INSERTING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE ROTATING HEMOSTATIC VALVE OR THE GUIDE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE BALLOON CATHETER THROUGH THE VESSEL OR CROSSING THE LESION. THE CATHETER WAS NEVER IN AN ACUTE BEND. TH

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10815791 ↗
  • InjuryMar 27, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, THE AVIATOR PLUS .014¿ 6.0MMX40MM 142CM WAS INSERTED AND BLOWN UP TO NOMINAL PRESSURE. HOWEVER, THE BALLOON BROKE AT NOMINAL PRESSURE BECAUSE OF THE LARGE CALCIFIED PLAQUE IN VESSEL. THERE WAS AN INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THEY TOOK PICTURE AND SAW LARGE EXTRAVASATION. SHEATH, ANGIOGUARD, AND STENT WERE PLACED WITH NO ISSUES. THE SHEATH WAS EXCHANGED AND NON-CORDIS COVERED STENT WAS PLACED, FOLLOWED BY 6X40 NON-CORDIS BALLOON. NO EXTRAVASATION SEEN ON POST PICTURE IN 2 ANGLES. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON, THERE WAS PLAQUE RUPTURE WITH THE DEPLOYMENT OF STENTING AND BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY. THE HEAVILY CALCIFIED PLAQUE MAY HAVE CAUSED THE BALLOON TO RUPTURE. THE PATIENT REQUIRED A SECONDARY PROCEDURE, STENTING WITH COVERED STENT X 2. AS PER THE SALES REP, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SYMPTOMS OF A STROKE, THE PATIENT WAS NON-VERBAL/NON-MOTOR RESPONSES AND WAS SENT DIRECTLY TO CATSCAN. THE PATIENT BEGAN RECOVERING MOTOR FUNCTIONS DURING THE SCAN. THE LESION HAD MODERATE TO SEVERE PLAQUE CALCIFICATION. THERE WAS NO VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THE PERCENTAGE OF STENOSIS WAS GREATER THAN 50%. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED FOR A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION AND WAS STORED AND HANDLED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR U

    Patient problems: Extravasation; Stroke/CVA

    MAUDE report 9889468 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page