Skip to content

POWERFLEX 4400404XRecalls & reported problems

Cordis US Corp. · POWERFLEXPRO 4MM4CM 135 · Class 2

All models of POWERFLEX (56)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032059159), received between Jul 9, 2020 and Feb 14, 2024 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel4
  • Delivered as Unsterile Product1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 14, 2024Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product

    AS REPORTED, THE 4MM 4CM POWERFLEX PRO BALLOON WAS NOT PACKAGED ASEPTICALLY. AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PLASTIC ASEPTIC PACKAGE INSIDE WAS NOT SEALED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AS MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE WITHOUT SUCCESS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18702401 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 20, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, THE BALLOON OF A 4 MM X 40 MM POWERFLEX PRO PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) DILATATION CATHETER RUPTURED WHILE THE PRESSURE WAS RAISED TO INFLATE THE BALLOON; THEREFORE, IT COULD NOT BE USED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE PROCEDURE WAS A PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOGRAPHY (PTA). THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16776119 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2021Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, THE BALLOON OF A 4MM X 4CM X 135CM POWERFLEX PRO PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER RUPTURED AT NOMINAL PRESSURE ON THE FOURTH INFLATION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP, REMOVING THE PROTECTIVE BALLOON COVER OR WHEN REMOVING THE STYLET OR ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THERE WERE NO KINKS OR OTHER DAMAGES NOTED PRIOR TO INSERTING THE PRODUCT INTO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICE PREP NORMALLY. THE CONTRAST TO SALINE RATIO WAS 50/50. A NON-CORDIS BRAND OF INDEFLATOR WAS USED.THE SAME INDEFLATOR WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY WITH OTHER DEVICES. THE LESION WAS NOT CALCIFIED AND HAD NO VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE BALLOON CATHETER THROUGH THE VESSEL. THE BALLOON INFLATED NORMALLY. THE BALLOON BURST AT NOMINAL PRESSURE. THE BALLOON-MAINTAINED PRESSURE DURING THE FIRST 3 INFALTIONS. THE BALLOON DID NOT SEEM TO ¿STICK¿ TO A STENT. THE BALLOON RE-WRAP PROPERLY. THE BALLOON CATHETER DID NOT KINK WHILE BEING USED. THE BALLOON CATHETER WAS REMOVED EASILY FROM THE VESSEL, SHEATH, RHV (ROTATING HEMOSTATIC VALVE, GUIDEWIRE AND GUIDE CATHETER. THE PRODUCT WAS REMOVED INTAC

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11154711 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, A 4MM X 4CM X 135CM POWERFLEX PRO PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED; BUT IT RUPTURED AT 4 ATMOSPHERES (ATM). THEREFORE, IT WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER UNKNOWN BALLOON CATHETER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION DUE TO PATIENT'S INFECTIOUS DISEASE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10868930 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 9, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, A POWERFLEX PRO (4MM X 4CM X 135CM) PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETERS WERE USED, DELIVERED TO THE LESION AND INFLATED, HOWEVER, THEY RUPTURED WITHIN THEIR NOMINAL PRESSURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICES WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AS IT WAS DISCARDED DUE TO INFECTIOUS DISEASE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10250102 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page