Skip to content

POWERFLEX 4400522XRecalls & reported problems

Cordis US Corp. · POWERFLEXPRO 5MM22CM 135 · Class 2

All models of POWERFLEX (56)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032059456), received between Jun 5, 2017 and Apr 28, 2020 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2020Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    DURING PROCEDURE, THE 5MM X 22CM 135CM POWERFLEX PRO WAS RUPTURED AT THE CALCIFIED VESSEL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10005772 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 5, 2017Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT FIVE (5) POWERFLEX PRO BALLOON CATHETER (BC) BURST AT TEN TO TWELVE ATMOSPHERE (10-12 ATM) DURING THE INTERVENTION IN THE SAME PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICE WAS PREP NORMALLY. THERE WERE NO DIFFICULTY INFLATING THE BALLOONS DURING PREP. THERE WERE NO DIFFICULTIES REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP, THE PROTECTIVE BALLOON COVER, THE STYLET OR ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THERE WERE NO KINKS OR OTHER DAMAGES NOTED PRIOR TO INSERTING THE PRODUCT THE PRODUCT INTO THE PATIENT. THE PRODUCT WAS REMOVED INTACT (IN ONE PIECE) FROM THE PATIENT. CONTRAST MEDIA USED WAS SOLUTRAST 350. THE CONTRAST TO SALINE RATIO WAS CM+NACL. THE TYPE AND BRAND OF INFLATION DEVICE USED WAS ARCROYAL WHICH WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY WITH OTHER DEVICES. THERE WERE NO RESISTANCE/FRICTION NOTED WHILE INSERTING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE ROTATING HEMOSTATIC VALVE, GUIDE CATHETER, AND THROUGH THE VESSEL. THERE WERE NO DIFFICULTY CROSSING THE LESION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6610712 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page