Skip to content

SABER 48006002SRecalls & reported problems

Cordis Corporation · SABER 6MM2CM 90 · Class 2

All models of SABER (40)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032068724), received between Jun 18, 2019 and Jun 14, 2024 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K133843); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 1 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2
  • Material Frayed1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 14, 2024Material Frayed; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Frayed; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    AS REPORTED, A 6MM2CM SABER BALLOON WAS DEFECTIVE AND CAUSED AN ISSUE DURING A CASE TODAY. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED WITHIN A STENT IN A PULMONARY VEIN. THE BALLOON WOULD NOT DEFLATE. THE CATHETER WAS NOTED TO HAVE A HOLE THAT WAS PREVENTING DEFLATION. A 7X2 SABER AND A 6X2 SABER BALLOON WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED PROPERLY ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP, REMOVING THE PROTECTIVE BALLOON COVER, STYLET, OR ANY OF THE PACKAGE GENE COMPONENTS. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED PER THE IFU. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED NORMALLY AND WAS ABLE TO MAINTAIN NEGATIVE PRESSURE. THE LESION WAS NOTED TO HAVE NO CALCIFICATION AND NO VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THAT DEVICE WAS NOT BEING USED TO TREAT A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO). THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE/FRICTION WHILE INSERTING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE ROTATING HEMOSTATIC VALVE. THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE/ FRICTION WHILE INSERTING A BALLOON THROUGH THE UNKNOWN GUIDE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY ADVANCING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE VESSEL. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY CROSSING THE LESION WITH THE BALLOON. THE CATHETER WAS NEVER IN

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19537490 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 2, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, A SABER BALLOON CATHETER (6MM2CM 90) WAS DELIVERED TO THE LESION IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY AND INFLATED, HOWEVER, THE BALLOON RUPTURED WITHIN ITS NOMINAL PRESSURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THE DEVICE WAS CLINICALLY USED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED OR ANALYSIS.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8752907 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 18, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, A 6MMX2CM SABER PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER (BC) WAS INSERTED AND INFLATED, HOWEVER IT RUPTURED DUE TO HEAVY CALCIFICATION. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. THE LESION WAS THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THE PERCENTAGE OF STENOSIS WAS SEVENTY PERCENT AND IT WAS NOT A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO). THERE WAS MODERATE VESSEL ANGULATION. THE DEVICE WAS STORED, HANDLED, INSPECTED AND PREPPED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU), AND THE DEVICE PREPPED NORMALLY. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP, NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PROTECTIVE BALLOON COVER, AND NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE STYLET OR ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THE SAME INDEFLATOR WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY WITH OTHER DEVICES. THERE WERE NO KINKS OR OTHER DAMAGES NOTED PRIOR TO INSERTING THE PRODUCT INTO THE PATIENT. THE BALLOON CATHETER DID NOT KINK WHILE BEING USED. THERE WAS NO UNUSUAL FORCE USED AT ANY TIME DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE BALLOON CATHETER REMOVED EASILY AND INTACT (IN ONE PIECE) FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW NON-CORDIS BALLOON CATHETER. THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED BY MISTAKE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8707081 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K133843. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2235-2021 · Jul 19, 2021 · Terminated
    Cordis SABER PTA Balloon Dilation Catheter, 4F, REF 48004010X

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page