Skip to content

SABER 48003020XRecalls & reported problems

Cordis Corporation · SABER 3MM20CM 150 · Class 2

All models of SABER (40)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032069110), received between Sep 30, 2019 and Aug 11, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Leak/Splash” (2 reports).

1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K133843); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Leak/Splash2
  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 11, 2026Burst Container or Vessel

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50212698 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 16, 2025Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    AS REPORTED, AFTER ADVANCING THE 3X200 SABER PERCUTNEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON INTO THE VESSEL AND APPLYING PRESSURE. THE BALLOON COULD NOT INFLATE PROPERLY. AFTER ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO PRESSURIZE, LEAKAGE WAS FOUND IN THE BALLOON. THE BALLOON WAS THEN WITHDRAWN, AND ANOTHER BALLOON OF THE SAME MODEL WAS USED TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. NO OTHER SERIOUS ADVERSE OUTCOMES OCCURRED. THIS OCCURRED DURING A BELOW-THE-KNEE ARTERY PTA PROCEDURE. A 2.5X300 SABER PTA BALLOON WAS USED FIRST, WHICH WENT SMOOTHLY. THE 3X200 PTA BALLOON WAS USED FOR STEPWISE DILATATION. THE PRODUCT WAS STORED AND PREPPED ACCORDING TO THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). NO ISSUES WERE NOTED DURING REMOVAL FROM THE HOOP, PROTECTIVE COVER, OR STERILE PACKAGING. NO DAMAGE OR KINKS WERE OBSERVED PRIOR TO INSERTION. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS FOR A BELOW-THE-KNEE VESSEL OCCLUSION. THE LESION WAS MODERATELY CALCIFIED, MILDLY TORTUOUS, AND HAD A STENOSIS OF APPROXIMATELY 65¿75%. THE DEVICE WAS USED FOR TREATING A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO). THERE WERE NO DIFFICULTIES ADVANCING THE BALLOON THROUGH THE VESSEL OR CROSSING THE LESION. THE CATHETER WAS NOT PLACED IN AN ACUTE BEND. THE CONTRAST TO SALINE RATIO US

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23064499 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 30, 2025Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash

    AS REPORTED, A LEAKAGE WAS FOUND FROM THE BALLOON OF A 3MM X 20CM X 150 SABER PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) DILATATION CATHETER DURING DILATATION OF THE POPLITEAL ARTERY. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF SERIOUS INJURY. THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22117617 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2019Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, THE SABER (3MM20CM 150) BALLOON CATHETER WAS LOST FROM THE SHAFT INSIDE OF THE PATIENT. THE HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONER GRABBED SUCCESSFULLY THE LOST BALLOON AND BROUGHT IT OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT. RESISTANCE WAS MET WHILE WITHDRAWING THE DEVICE. NO INJURIES TO THE PATIENT OCCURRED AT THIS TIME. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE INTENDED PROCEDURE/TARGET LESION WAS THE PTA POPLITEAL ARTERY. THE LESION WAS MODERATELY CALCIFIED. THERE WAS NO TORTUOSITY OR VESSEL ANGULATION. THE PERCENTAGE OF STENOSIS WAS 80%. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED FOR A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (TOTAL OCCLUSION >3 MONTHS). THE DEVICE WAS NOT RESTERILIZED. THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES NOTED WHEN REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE. THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES NOTED DURING PREP. THE DEVICE WAS NOT INSERTED THROUGH A STOPCOCK INSTEAD OF A HEMOSTATIC VALVE. RESISTANCE WAS NOT MET WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE. EXCESSIVE TORQUING WAS NOT REQUIRED. RESISTANCE WAS NOT MET WHILE ADVANCING THE DEVICE OVER THE GUIDEWIRE. THE DEVICE DID NOT KINK IN THE AREA OF SEPARATION.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9135615 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K133843. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2235-2021 · Jul 19, 2021 · Terminated
    Cordis SABER PTA Balloon Dilation Catheter, 4F, REF 48004010X

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page