Skip to content

SaberX Radianz R51006010LRecalls & reported problems

Cordis Corporation · SABERX RADIANZ 6MM10CM 190 · Class 2

All models of SaberX Radianz (9)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032081303), received between Dec 20, 2019 and Jan 22, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Deflation Problem1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 22, 2024Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, AFTER INFLATION OF A 6MM X 10CM SABERX RADIANZ PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER OVER A NON-CORDIS GUIDEWIRE, THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE REMOVED DUE TO A LARGE ¿KNOT¿ FOUND ON THE GUIDEWIRE AND THE SABERX RADIANZ BALLOON CATHETER COULD NOT CROSS OVER THE KNOT TO EXIT THE PATIENT. FURTHER ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE THE SABERX RADIANZ BALLOON CATHETER WERE MADE, BUT THE SHAFT OF THE BALLOON CATHETER EVENTUALLY BROKE OFF OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT. AS A RESULT, A SURGICAL CUT DOWN WAS PERFORMED IN ORDER TO REMOVE THE SABERX RADIANZ BALLOON CATHETER FROM THE KNOTTED NON-CORDIS GUIDEWIRE. A SECOND ACCESS POINT WAS MADE IN THE GROIN AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A CONTINUOUS TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR (TPA) DRIP. THERE WERE NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. THIS WAS DURING A PROCEDURE TO TREAT A ¿COLD LEG¿ WHICH REQUIRED A TPA DRIP. THE SABERX RADIANZ BALLOON CATHETER WAS TO BE USED FOR ANGIOPLASTY OF THE MID TO DISTAL SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THE DEVICE WAS BEING USED WITH A SHORT CATHETER SHEATH INTRODUCER (CSI) AND WAS INSERTED FROM THE RADIAL ARTERY. THE DEVICE WAS STORED AND PREPPED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVIN

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18553606 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 8, 2023Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem

    AS REPORTED, ALL THREE SABER X RADIANZ BALLOONS FAILED TO DEFLATE IN AN APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF TIME. WITH ALL THREE BALLOONS IT TOOK 12 TO 15 SECONDS TO FULLY DEFLATE AND THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO PULL NEGATIVE THREE TIMES ON EVERY BALLOON, AFTER EVERY INFLATION, IN ORDER TO GET IT FULLY DEFLATED. ON COUPLE OF ATTEMPTS THE BALLOON DID NOT FULLY DEFLATE. ALSO, ONCE THE BALLOONS WERE REMOVED FROM THE BODY THEY COULD NOT BE REINSERTED AS THEY DID NOT EVER REWRAP. IT WAS FEARED THE LARGE, UNWRAPPED PROFILE OF THE USED BALLOON DISRUPT THE STENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE DEVICES WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED; HOWEVER, THE INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16705204 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 20, 2019Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, THE 6MM 10CM 155 SABER RAPID EXCHANGE (RX) PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) CATHETER WAS INSERTED AND INFLATED, HOWEVER, THE PRESSURE WAS NOT ABLE TO RISE OVER 3 ATMOSPHERES (ATM). THEREFORE, IT WAS CONFIRMED THROUGH ANGIOGRAPHY THAT THE SALINE LEAKED FROM THE BALLOON CATHETER. THE TARGET LESION WAS SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) WITH STENOSIS. A 6F UNKNOWN SHEATH INTRODUCER AND 0.14 UNKNOWN GUIDEWIRE WERE USED. THE SABER RX CATHETER WAS REPLACED WITH ANOTHER 6MM NON-CORDIS BALLOON CATHETER AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY. THE LESION HAD MODERATE CALCIFICATION AND MODERATE VESSEL TORTUOSITY. THERE WAS 90% STENOSIS. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED FOR CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO). THE DEVICE WAS STORED AND HANDLED AS PER THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE (IFU). THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED TO THE PACKAGING OF THE DEVICE PRIOR TO USE. THE DEVICE WAS PREPPED NORMALLY MAINTAINING NEGATIVE PRESSURE ACCORDING TO THE IFU. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PRODUCT FROM THE HOOP. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PROTECTIVE BALLOON COVER. THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE STYLET OR ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THERE WAS NO KIN

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9504584 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page