Skip to content

SaberX Radianz R51008006LRecalls & reported problems

Cordis US Corp. · SABERX RADIANZ 8MM6CM 190 · Class 2

All models of SaberX Radianz (24)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032081877), received between Mar 8, 2023 and Aug 19, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Burst Container or Vessel” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Burst Container or Vessel2
  • Difficult to Remove1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 19, 2025Burst Container or Vessel; Burst Container or Vessel

    AS REPORTED, THE 8MM 6CM SABERX RADIANZ PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON RUPTURED DURING POST-DILATATION OF THE 6X60MM SMART ILIAC STENT. THE BALLOON RUPTURED AT NOMINAL PRESSURE. ANOTHER PRODUCT 8-40MM SABERX WAS USED TO RE-DILATE AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO REPORTED INJURY TO THE PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DEVICE RETURN WAS REQUESTED; HOWEVER, NEITHER WERE OBTAINED AFTER MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS MADE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22841580 ↗
  • InjuryMar 8, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Difficult to Remove; Burst Container or Vessel; Difficult to Remove

    AS REPORTED, A PROCEDURE TO TREAT A 90% STENOSIS OF THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY (CIA) WAS PERFORMED VIA THE LEFT RADIAL ARTERY. A 5F NON-CORDIS CATHETER SHEATH INTRODUCER (CSI) WAS INSERTED VIA THE LEFT RADIAL ARTERY AND A NON-CORDIS .035 GUIDEWIRE WAS PLACED IN THE ABDOMINAL AORTA WITH AN UNKNOWN PIGTAIL CATHETER. THE 5F NON - CORDIS CSI WAS THEN EXCHANGED FOR A 110CM BRITE TIP RADIANZ CSI. A NON-CORDIS .018 FLOPPY GUIDEWIRE WAS PLACED ACROSS THE LESION AND AN INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) WAS PERFORMED WITH A NON-CORDIS IVUS CATHETER. NEXT, PRE-DILATION WAS PERFORMED WITH AN 8MM X 60MM SABERX RADIANZ PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER. A 10MM X 60MM SMART RADIANZ SELF-EXPANDING STENT (SES) WAS THEN INSERTED VIA THE LEFT RADIAL ARTERY AND WAS IMPLANTED. DURING IMPLANTATION, THE TANTALUM MARKERS WERE OBSERVED TO OPEN SYMMETRICALLY AND THE STENT WAS FULLY OPPOSED TO THE VESSEL WALL WHEN DEPLOYED. AN IVUS WAS THEN ATTEMPTED WITH THE NON-CORDIS IVUS CATHETER; HOWEVER, THE IVUS CATHETER WAS CAUGHT ON THE PROXIMAL EDGE OF THE IMPLANTED SMART STENT CAUSING THE STENT MARKER EDGE TO BECOME UPLIFTED. THE NON-CORDIS IVUS CATHETER WAS THEN REMOVED AND THE 8MM X 6

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16503614 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page