Skip to content

SaberX Radianz R51010004LRecalls & reported problems

Cordis Corporation · SABERX RADIANZ 10MM4CM 190 · Class 2

All models of SaberX Radianz (9)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20705032086735), received between Aug 16, 2023 and Feb 28, 2024 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Burst Container or Vessel1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 28, 2024Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    AS REPORTED, A 10MM X 4CM SABERX RADIANZ PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER WAS STUCK ON AN IMPLANTED SMART SELF-EXPANDING STENT (SES) AND WAS UNABLE TO CROSS AN ILIAC ARTERY LESION. ADDITIONALLY, THERE WAS DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE; HOWEVER, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED SLOWLY FROM THE PATIENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. A VASSALLO GUIDEWIRE WAS USED WITH THE SABERX RADIANZ PTA BALLOON CATHETER DURING THIS PROCEDURE AND THERE WAS NO RESISTANCE BETWEEN THE SABERX RADIAN PTA BALLOON CATHETER AND THE GUIDEWIRE. THE DEVICE WAS STORED AND PREPPED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) AND THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THE DEVICE WAS ABLE TO MAINTAIN NEGATIVE PRESSURE DURING PREPARATION. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18799376 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 16, 2023Burst Container or Vessel; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Burst Container or Vessel; Difficult to Remove; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    AS REPORTED, THE BALLOON OF AN 10MM X 4CM SABERX RADIANZ PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) BALLOON CATHETER BURST. WHEN TRYING TO REMOVE THE RADIANZ PTA, THE DEVICE WAS STUCK WITHIN A 110CM BRITE TIP RADIANZ CATHETER SHEATH INTRODUCER (CSI). THE BRITE TIP RADIANZ CSI WAS REMOVED UNDER ASPIRATION AND THE RADIANZ PTA CAME OUT WITH THE CSI; HOWEVER, THE RADIANZ PTA BALLOON CATHETER DID NOT REMAIN IN ONE PIECE DURING ITS REMOVAL. A 10MM X 8CM SABERX RADIANZ PTA BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO INJURIES TO THE PATIENT. THIS WAS DURING A PROCEDURE TO TREAT AN ILIAC LESION WHICH HAD SEVERE CALCIFICATION BUT SHOWED NO SIGNS OF TORTUOSITY. THE DEVICE WAS STORED AND PREPPED PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) AND THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING ANY OF THE STERILE PACKAGING COMPONENTS. THE BALLOON WAS PREPPED WITH A 60% CONTRAST AND 40% SALINE MIXTURE. THE DEVICE WILL BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17558026 ↗

Other Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices

All Catheter, angioplasty, peripheral, transluminal devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page