Linvatec SRS PopLok GKP-2801Recalls & reported problems
Conmed Corporation · POPLOK SUTURE ANCHOR WITH ONE #2 (5 METRIC) HI-FI SUTURE, 2.8 MM · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Linvatec SRS PopLok (5)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 20845854014117), received between May 29, 2024 and May 19, 2026 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (3 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K091549); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Fragmentation3
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 19, 2026Material Fragmentation
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE, GKP-2801, SUTURE ANCHOR WITH ONE #2 (5 METRIC) HI-FI SUTURE,2.8 MM, WAS USED DURING A RC REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2026 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED, ¿DURING A SURGICAL PROCEDURE ONE POPLOK SUTURE 2.8MM ANCHOR WAS FOUND DAMAGED.¿. THE DRIVER TIP FRAGMENTATION HAD FALLEN IN THE PATIENT; HOWEVER, THE FRAGMENTATION WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AS PLANNED WITH AN ALTERNATE, UNKNOWN DEVICE. BOTH THE PATIENT AND DOCTOR WERE REPORTED AS ¿GOOD¿. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR HOSPITALIZATION. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED DUE TO THE REPORTED MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25215064 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE GKP-2801, 2.8 MM POPLOK SUTURE ANCHOR, DEVICE WAS BEING USED DURING A BANKART REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2024 WHEN IT WAS REPORTED ¿SURGEON FOLLOWED THE IFU TO USE POPLOK 2.8MM. HE DRILLED PILOT HOLE AND INSERTED ANCHOR. WHILE TENSIONING SUTURE, THE SUTURE SLIPPED OUT FROM THE ANCHOR AND THE IMPLANT BROKE AT DISTAL END.¿. FURTHER ASSESSMENT QUESTIONING FOUND THAT THE DEVICE DID FRAGMENT AND WAS REMOVED WITH THE USE OF AN ARTHROSCOPIC GRASPER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF THE SAME ALTERNATE DEVICE. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS ¿RECOVERING WELL.¿. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT OR USER. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19416483 ↗MalfunctionMay 29, 2024Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
THE DISTRIBUTOR REPORTED ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER THAT THE GKP-2801, 2.8 MM POPLOK SUTURE ANCHOR, DEVICE WAS BEING USED DURING A BANKART REPAIR PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) WHEN IT WAS REPORTED ¿SURGEON FOLLOWED THE IFU TO USE POPLOK 2.8MM. HE DRILLED PILOT HOLE AND INSERTED ANCHOR. WHILE TENSIONING SUTURE, THE SUTURE SLIPPED OUT FROM THE ANCHOR AND THE IMPLANT BROKE AT DISTAL END.¿. FURTHER ASSESSMENT QUESTIONING FOUND THAT THE DEVICE DID FRAGMENT AND WAS REMOVED WITH THE USE OF AN ARTHROSCOPIC GRASPER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH THE USE OF THE SAME ALTERNATE DEVICE. THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS ¿RECOVERING WELL.¿. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF INJURY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR EXTENDED HOSPITALIZATION FOR THE PATIENT OR USER. THIS REPORT IS BEING RAISED ON THE BASIS OF MALFUNCTION WITH POTENTIAL FOR INJURY UPON REOCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19416480 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K091549. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0253-2018 · Apr 17, 2017 · TerminatedNonabsorbable suture anchor system intended to reattach soft tissue to bone in orthopedic surgical procedures may be used in either arthroscopic or open surgical procedures.
Other FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE devices
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228151Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,686 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228152Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE1,398 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228142Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE932 reports
- FOOTPRINT 72202901Smith & Nephew, Inc. · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE721 reports
- RIGIDLOOP 232447Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE633 reports
- Arthrex® AR-3636Arthrex, Inc. · Fastener, fixation, nondegradable, soft tissue624 reports
- OMNISPAN ORTHOCORD 228141Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE609 reports
- TRUESPAN ORTHOCORD 228162Medos International Sàrl · FASTENER, FIXATION, NONDEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE460 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page