Skip to content

Infant Flow SiPAP 7772020LPRecalls & reported problems

Carefusion Corporation · PACKAGE ASSEMBLY,INFANT FLOW,LP · Class 2

All models of Infant Flow SiPAP (7)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 50846446004616), received between Jan 17, 2019 and Nov 3, 2020 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Defective Device” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Defective Device1
  • Mechanical Problem1
  • Pressure Problem1

Patient problems

  • Low Oxygen Saturation1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 3, 2020Defective Device; Defective Device

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE 7772020LP PACKAGE ASSEMBLY, INFANT FLOW, LP HAS A VERY DIFFERENT ANGLE ON MEDIUM MASK THAN THE SMALL AND LARGE. THE CUSTOMER CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT. THE SAMPLE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT TO PREVENT PRESSURE INJURY AND NASAL OCCLUSION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10779191 ↗
  • InjuryJan 15, 2020Pressure Problem; Pressure Problem

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE INFANT FLOW WITH A SET OF CONTINUOUS POSITIVE NASAL PRESSURE GENERATOR HAD PRESSURE ANOMALY (POSITIVE EXPIRATORY PRESSURE AND INSPIRATORY PRESSURE) WHILE IN USE ON A PATIENT THAT RESULTED IN DECREASED OXYGEN SATURATION (SAO2) IN THE NEONATE. AT FIRST, THE OPERATOR CHANGED THE DEVICE WITH SAME LOT NUMBER (LOT: 0004076953), BUT NO SUCCESS. THEN THEY CHANGED THE DEVICE AGAIN WITH A DIFFERENT LOT NUMBER (LOT: 0004045851) AND NO RECURRENCE OF THE INCIDENT.

    Patient problems: Low Oxygen Saturation

    MAUDE report 9593438 ↗
  • InjuryJan 17, 2019Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED TO VYAIRE THAT THE SIPAP FAILED WHILE CONNECTED TO A PATIENT. THE SUSPECT DEVICE ALARMED ERROR 33 AND WAS UNABLE TO AUTO ZERO. THE CLINICIAN IMMEDIATELY REMOVED THE PATIENT FROM THE DEVICE. THE CUSTOMER CONFIRMED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THE REPORTED EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8258445 ↗

Other Ventilator, Continuous, Facility Use devices

All Ventilator, Continuous, Facility Use devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page