DigitalDiagnost C90Recalls & reported problems across all models
Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH · 2 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
5 open recalls name at least one DigitalDiagnost C90 model. Check whether yours is affected in the recall details, and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 107
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls
- 5
We found 2 models of DigitalDiagnost C90 by Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 107 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Jun 15, 2021 and Sep 24, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 102 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Fell” (88 reports).
5 FDA recall records name at least one of these models by its device identifier, 5 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
DigitalDiagnost C90 recalls
FDA recall records that name at least one of these models by its device identifier, newest first. Each recall usually covers specific models or lots, so check the details.
- May 1, 2026Open, Classified
System was delivered without the required Seismic kit for Wall Stand VS2, which is designed to prevent damage and ensure stability of the Wall Stand VS2 during seismic events.
Z-2354-2026 · Root cause: Device Design · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Oct 1, 2025Open, Classified
Philips has identified that some ceiling suspension telescopic carriages manufactured from July 2024 through June 2025 may be difficult to move vertically (i.e. additional force/physical exertion required for manual movement) due to potential manufacturing issues.
Z-0465-2026 · Root cause: Device Design · names 2 of these models · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Sep 21, 2023Open, Classified
Potential for units suspended on the ceiling to fail and fall.
Z-0276-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- Sep 21, 2023Open, Classified
Potential for units suspended on the ceiling to fail and fall.
Z-0275-2024 · Root cause: Under Investigation by firm · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- May 19, 2023Open, Classified
There is a software login in issue that may prevent the user from logging in.
Z-2042-2023 · Root cause: Software change control · names 2 of these models · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported DigitalDiagnost C90 problems
Device problems
- Device Fell88
- Device Handling Problem86
- Detachment of Device or Device Component10
- Poor Quality Image7
- Mechanical Jam4
- Insufficient Device Problem Information2
- Misassembled During Installation2
- Circuit Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions101
- Insufficient Information4
- Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
- Laceration(s)1
- Muscle/Tendon Damage1
- Skin Tears1
DigitalDiagnost C90 models
2 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- DigitalDiagnost C90 712034Solid state x-ray imager (flat panel/digital imager)3 recalls90 reports
- DigitalDiagnost C90 712035Solid state x-ray imager (flat panel/digital imager)4 recalls17 reports
Recent DigitalDiagnost C90 adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 24, 2026Mechanical Jam
It was reported that the system did not release efficiently while in use and the customer had to drag the tube head. They also noted that the pulling of the system was also a problem and was severely straining on their shoulders. Additional information has been requested from the customer to clarify the allegations and support further investigation and assessment, and a response is currently pending.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50881325 ↗InjurySep 24, 2026Mechanical Jam
It was reported that the Comfort Positioning feature was not performing as intended while the device was in clinical use. It was further alleged that multiple workers' compensation incidents had occurred as a result of the issue. However, the information currently available is insufficient to adequately assess the reported events. Additional information has been requested from the customer to clarify the allegations and support further investigation and assessment, and a response is currently pending.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50881324 ↗InjurySep 24, 2026Mechanical Jam
It was reported that the Comfort Positioning feature was not performing as intended while the device was in clinical use. It was further alleged that multiple workers' compensation incidents had occurred as a result of the issue. However, the information currently available is insufficient to adequately assess the reported events. Additional information has been requested from the customer to clarify the allegations and support further investigation and assessment, and a response is currently pending.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 50880756 ↗MalfunctionSep 16, 2026Mechanical Jam
It was reported that the Comfort Positioning feature was not performing as intended while the device was in clinical use. A Good Faith Effort (GFE) was initiated which confirmed that only one user was affected by the reported issue. The user, sustained a minor strain to their right (dominant) shoulder and was assessed by their general practitioner, including an ultrasound scan. No further treatment or medical intervention was required. The user has fully recovered, with no expected impact on function or range of motion.
Patient problems: Muscle/Tendon Damage
MAUDE report 50785869 ↗MalfunctionApr 3, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DAMPER ON WALL TRIPOD BROKEN OFF. THE DEVICE WAS NOT IN CLINICAL USE, AND THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT OR USER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24777074 ↗MalfunctionFeb 2, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TUBE CASING HAS COME LOOSE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24232718 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2025Circuit Failure; Smoking; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Circuit Failure; Smoking; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SYSTEM DOWN DUE TO UB BOARD BURNT. THE DEVICE WAS NOT IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23849379 ↗MalfunctionDec 9, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE THERE ARE ARTIFACTS ON THE BIG CASSETTE. THE DEVICE WAS IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23755207 ↗MalfunctionDec 9, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PORTABLE DETECTOR DROP. THE DEVICE WAS IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23755100 ↗MalfunctionDec 9, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DETECTOR DROPPED AND CUSTOMER NEEDS NEW DETECTOR. THE DEVICE WAS NOT IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23754728 ↗MalfunctionDec 2, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DETECTOR MECHANICALLY DAMAGED. THE DEVICE WAS IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23692334 ↗MalfunctionNov 24, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DETECTOR FELL FROM A STOOL, AND THE USER ASKED WHETHER IT COULD STILL BE USED NORMALLY. THE DEVICE REMAINED IN CLINICAL USE, AND NO HARM OCCURRED TO EITHER THE PATIENT OR THE USER.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23633717 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE REMOTE ALERT TRIGGERED FROM THE DETECTOR. THE DEVICE WAS IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23591939 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DETECTORS NOT CALIBRATING. THE DEVICE WAS IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED THAT THE DETECTOR DROPPED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23591572 ↗MalfunctionNov 19, 2025Device Handling Problem; Device Fell; Device Handling Problem; Device Fell
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DETECTOR HAS FALLEN AND IT IS GOING INTO INITIALIZATION MODE.THE DEVICE WAS IN CLINICAL USE AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT OR USER HARM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23591448 ↗
Other Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH products
All Philips Medical Systems DMC GmbH devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page