PROWATERRecalls & reported problems across all models
Asahi Intecc CO., Ltd. · 3 models in the FDA device registry
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 43
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 25
- Recalls
- 0
We found 3 models of PROWATER by Asahi Intecc CO., Ltd. in the FDA's device registry (GUDID). Together they are named in 43 adverse event reports in the FDA's MAUDE database, received between Sep 29, 2016 and Jul 21, 2026 — classified as 25 injuries, 18 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (17 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event. Widely used products collect more reports, so totals can't be used to compare products or estimate failure rates. Only reports that name a model's exact device identifier are counted. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works
Reports received per month, all models
Most reported PROWATER problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component17
- Break8
- Material Separation6
- Fracture5
- Material Deformation4
- Entrapment of Device3
- Material Fragmentation3
- Unraveled Material3
Patient problems
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque12
- Foreign Body In Patient10
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Insufficient Information5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In3
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Myocardial Infarction1
PROWATER models
3 models, most reported first. Each model has its own page with its reports, recalls and device details.
- PROWATER AGH146000WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER33 reports
- PROWATER AGH146300WIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER5 reports
- PROWATER AGH146000JWIRE, GUIDE, CATHETER5 reports
Recent PROWATER adverse event reports
The 15 most recent reports across all models, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 21, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ASAHI PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS USED FOR A PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED AND MILDLY TORTUOUS 75% OR LESS STENOSIS IN THE RAMUS INTERMEDIUS (RI). THE PROWATER GUIDE WIRE FORMED A LOOP AT THE PROXIMAL RI. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO STRAIGHTEN THE LOOP BY PULLING THE GUIDE WIRE. THE TIP OF THE PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS DETACHED AND REMAINED IN THE ARTERY. A STENT WAS DEPLOYED TO EMBED THE FRAGMENT AGAINST THE VESSEL WALL. IT WAS INFORMED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED. MFR REPORT #: 3003775027-2026-00140.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25895619 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2026Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ASAHI PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS USED FOR A PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED AND MILDLY TORTUOUS 75% OR LESS STENOSIS IN THE RAMUS INTERMEDIUS (RI). THE PROWATER GUIDE WIRE FORMED A LOOP AT THE PROXIMAL RI. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO STRAIGHTEN THE LOOP BY PULLING THE GUIDE WIRE. THE TIP OF THE PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS DETACHED AND REMAINED IN THE ARTERY. A STENT WAS DEPLOYED TO EMBED THE FRAGMENT AGAINST THE VESSEL WALL. IT WAS INFORMED THAT THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25834932 ↗MalfunctionDec 12, 2023Break; Break
PROWATER WIRE BECAME STUCK IN DISTAL LEFT MAIN/PROXIMAL LAD. PROWATER WIRE BECAME STUCK IN DISTAL LEFT MAIN/PROXIMAL LAD DURING CORONARY INTERVENTION. THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THAT THE WIRE WAS BROKEN PRIOR TO ADVANCING ANY BALLOON OR STENT. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO USE A BALLOON TO PIN THE WIRE TO THE GUIDE CATHETER AND REMOVE EVERYTHING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18315432 ↗InjuryDec 11, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ASAHI PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS USED DURING A PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED AND SEVERELY STENOSED LESION IN THE SEGMENT FROM THE LEFT MAIN TRUNK (LMT) TO THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD). THE PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS FOUND STUCK BETWEEN THE DISTAL LMT AND THE PROXIMAL LAD AND DAMAGED. A BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED TO FIX THE PROWATER GUIDE WIRE IN AN UNSPECIFIED GUIDING CATHETER, AND THE DEVICES WERE REMOVED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH REESTABLISHED BLOOD FLOW BY STENTING. IT WAS INFORMED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18299109 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
USER FACILITY VOLUNTARY MEDWATCH REPORT (MDR REPORT #: MW5117196) WAS RECEIVED VIA THE US DISTRIBUTOR ON MAY 10, 2023. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF AN ASAHI PROWATER GUIDE WIRE BROKE OFF DURING A PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION TO TREAT A HEAVILY CALCIFIED 90-99% STENOSIS IN THE OSTIUM OF THE RAMUS ARTERY ARISING FROM THE LEFT MAIN (LM). DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PROWATER WIRE WAS USED IN AN ATTEMPT TO PLACE A DRUG ELUTING STENT. WHEN THE PROWATER WIRE WAS PROTRACTED, IT WAS NOTED TO HAVE COME BACK AND THE TIP OF THE WIRE WAS SEEN EMBOLIZED TO THE DISTAL RAMUS. THE STENT REMAINED PARTIALLY IN THE LM. GIVEN THE NON-OBSTRUCTIVE LM DISEASE, FURTHER MANEUVERS WERE FELT TO BE UNSAFE. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO LEAVE THE RAMUS AS A PTCA ALONE. GIVEN THE WIRE FRAGMENT WAS VERY DISTAL, ATTEMPTS TO SNARE THE FRAGMENT WERE FELT TO BE HIGH RISK FOR CAUSING ISCHEMIA AND VESSEL INJURY. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE RETAINED FRAGMENT MEASURES APPROXIMATELY 2.5 CM. NO IDENTIFIED ADVERSE OUTCOMES TO DATE. PATIENT DISCHARGED TO HOME WITHOUT HARM RELATED TO THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 16971106 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2023Fracture; Fracture
TYPE OF PROCEDURE-OTHER DEVICES USED-LESION INFORMATION - DIAGNOSTIC CATH -LHB W/WO LV, IVUS SINGLE VESSEL, INTERVENTIONAL CATHETERIZATION - SINGLE DE STENT, CATH ADJ DX - PERIPHERAL IVUS ADDL VESSEL. LEVEL OF DISEASE-CALCIUM ETC[?].. LESION IN TRUE RAMUS ARISING FROM THE LM. 99% STENOSIS IN OSTIAL RI WITH TIMI2 FLOW CONCERNING FOR PLAQUE RUPTURE. PATIENT HARM - NO HARM DETECTED. DEVICE ABLE TO BE RETURNED? NO. MDR REPORT #: MW5117196 [INITIAL REPORTER: (B)(6) (NURSE)]. [DESCRIBE EVENT OR PROBLEM]. DURING INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC PROCEDURE, PROWATER WIRE USED IN AN ATTEMPT TO PLACE STENT. WHEN THE PROWATER WIRE WAS PROTRACTED, IT WAS NOTED TO HAVE COME BACK AND THE TIP OF THE WIRE WAS SEEN EMBOLIZED TO THE DISTAL RAMUS. THE STENT REMAINED PARTIALLY IN THE LM. GIVEN THE NONOBSTRUCTIVE LM DISEASE, FURTHER MANEUVERS WERE FELT TO BE UNSAFE. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO LEAVE THE RI AS A PTCA ALONE. GIVEN THE WIRE FRAGMENT WAS VERY DISTAL, ATTEMPTS TO SNARE THE FRAGMENT WERE FELT TO BE HIGH RISK FOR CAUSING ISCHEMIA AND VESSEL INJURY. IT IS ESTIMATED THAT THE RETAINED FRAGMENT MEASURES APPROXIMATELY 2.5 CM. NO IDENTIFIED ADVERSE OUTCOMES TO DATE. PATIENT DISCHARGED TO HOME ON (B)(6) 2023.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16942839 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2023Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
CROSSED THROUGH A DOUBLE-JAILED SIDE BRANCH WITH INTENT OF PROTECTING IT PRIOR TO POST-DILATION. THE RADIO-OPAQUE PORTION PASSED INTO THE SIDE BRANCH BUT I COULD NOT ADVANCE IT FURTHER. I THEN TRIED TO RETRACT THE WIRE (THIS IS ALL PRIOR TO ANY POST-DILATION/BALLOONING OF THE DOUBLE-JAILED AREA) AND IT WOULD NOT RETRACT. I TRIED TO FREE IT UP BY PASSING A 2.0 BALLOON OVER IT AND IT WOULD NOT. THEN WITH GENTLE PRESSURE I FELT THE WIRE GIVE. WITH FURTHER PRESSURE I WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE WHOLE WIRE INCLUDING THE RADIO-OPAQUE TIP. AFTER REMOVING IT FROM THE BODY IT WAS CLEAR IT HAD UNRAVELED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16940765 ↗MalfunctionMay 1, 2023Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PLAIN OLD BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY (POBA) WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT AN UNSPECIFIED LESION IN THE CORONARY ARTERY. AN ASAHI PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS USED TO CROSS THROUGH A DOUBLE-JAILED SIDE BRANCH WITH INTENT OF PROTECTING IT PRIOR TO POST-DILATION. THE RADIOPAQUE PORTION PASSED INTO THE SIDE BRANCH BUT IT COULD NOT ADVANCE FURTHER. THE OPERATOR THEN TRIED TO RETRACT THE WIRE (THIS WAS ALL PRIOR TO ANY POST-DILATION/BALLOONING OF THE DOUBLE-JAILED AREA) AND IT WOULD NOT RETRACT. THE OPERATOR TRIED TO FREE IT UP BY PASSING A 2.0 BALLOON OVER IT AND IT WOULD NOT. THEN WITH GENTLE PRESSURE THE OPERATOR FELT THE WIRE GIVE. WITH FURTHER PRESSURE IT WAS ABLE TO RETRIEVE THE WHOLE WIRE INCLUDING THE RADIOPAQUE TIP. AFTER REMOVING IT FROM THE PATIENT BODY, IT WAS CLEAR IT HAD UNRAVELLED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16850693 ↗InjuryMar 15, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ASAHI PROWATER (RINATO) GUIDE WIRE BROKE OFF DURING PLAIN OLD BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY (POBA) TO TREAT A 90% STENOSIS IN THE CORONARY ARTERY. BEFORE BALLOONING, INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND (IVUS) WAS DONE TO ASSESS PRIOR TO STENTING AND IT WAS NOTED THE DISTAL EDGE OF PROWATER GUIDE WIRE HAD DISLODGED INTO A SMALL VESSEL AT THE VERY DISTAL PART OF THE HIGH OBTUSE MARGINAL BRANCH (OM1).THE PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO SNARE IT BUT IT WENT UNSUCCESSFUL. AFTER CONSULTING WITH SURGEON AND PEERS, DECISION WAS MADE NOT TO PROCEED WITH ANY INTERVENTION TO REMOVE THE WIRE EITHER ENDOVASCULARLY OR SURGICALLY. THE WIRE FRAGMENT WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT DID WELL WITHOUT ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 16542721 ↗InjuryMar 13, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
DURING HEART CATH ON (B)(6) 2023 BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY WAS DONE WITH LESION OPENING UP. INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND WAS DONE TO ASSESS PRIOR STENT AND IT WAS NOTED DISTAL EDGE OF PROWATER WIRE HAD DISLODGED INTO A SMALL VESSEL AT THE VERY DISTAL PART OF THE HIGH OML. ATTEMPTED TO SNARE IT UNSUCCESSFUL. CONSULTED WITH SURGEON AND PEERS AND DECISION MADE TO NOT PROCEED WITH ANY INTERVENTION TO REMOVE THE WIRE EITHER ENDOVASCULARLY OR SURGICALLY. FOREIGN BODY LEFT IN PATIENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16534899 ↗MalfunctionJun 12, 2022Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Fracture; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT "PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL AS A CODE BLUE STEMI AND CATH LAB TREATED THIS 68 YEAR OLD MALE PATIENT WITH OCCLUDED DISTAL CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY WITH MILD CALCIFICATION AND LESION TORTUOSITY, PROWATER WAS DELIVERED WITHOUT THE USE OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT AND MANIPULATED INTO THE DISTAL CIRCUMFLEX, BSC 2.5 CM BALLOON WAS DELIVERED OVER GUIDE WIRE AND PROWATER WAS THEN IDENTIFIED AS HAVING SEPARATED AT THE TIP." NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE. WIRE AND BALLOON WERE REMOVED WITHOUT INCIDENT AND THE CASE WAS COMPETED WITH ANOTHER PROWATER 190 WIRE WITH SAME LOT #. PATIENT WAS STABILIZED AND RECOVERED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14672618 ↗MalfunctionJun 7, 2022Material Separation
PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO HOSPITAL AS A CODE BLUE STEMI AND CATH LAB TREATED THIS 68 YEAR OLD MALE PATIENT WITH OCCLUDED DISTAL CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY, PROWATER WAS DELIVERED WITHOUT THE USE OF ADDITIONAL SUPPORT AND MANIPULATED INTO THE DISTAL CIRC, BSC 2.5 CM BALLOON WAS DELIVERED OVER GUIDE WIRE AND PROWATER WAS THEN IDENTIFIED AS HAVING SEPARATED AT THE TIP" NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS ARE AVAILABLE. WIRE AND BALLOON WERE REMOVED WITHOUT INCIDENT AND THE CASE WAS COMPETED WITH ANOTHER PROWATER 190 WIRE WITH SAME LOT #.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14627300 ↗InjuryNov 9, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED FROM THE USER FACILITY VIA MAIL THAT AS ASAHI PROWATER GUIDE WIRE WAS USED IN THE PATIENT IN CATH LAB FOR STENTING OF SEVERELY CALCIFIED CORONARY ARTERY. THE WIRE BECAME LODGED IN THE CORONARY VESSEL POST STENTING. THE WIRE FRACTURED AND BROKE INSIDE THE VESSEL. ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO RETRIEVE, HOWEVER, THE FRAGMENT MIGRATED INTO THE AORTA. THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO A TERTIARY CARE CENTER. A 10 CM SEGMENT WAS REMOVED DURING SURGERY AT A DIFFERENT HOSPITAL. THE RETRIEVED FRAGMENT WAS DISCARDED. THE PATIENT WAS RELEASED AFTER SEVERAL DAYS POST OP. THE USER FACILITY HAD A ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS POST EPISODE WITH THIS CONCLUSION: "NOT OPERATOR OR EQUIPMENT AT FAULT".
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 12784168 ↗InjuryOct 20, 2021Break; Fracture; Migration or Expulsion of Device
PATIENT IN CATH LAB FOR STENTING OF CORONARY ARTERY. WIRE BECAME LODGED IN CORONARY VESSEL POST STENT. WIRE FRACTURED AND BROKE INSIDE VESSEL. ATTEMPT MADE TO RETRIEVE, MIGRATED INTO AORTA. TRANSFERRED TO TERTIARY CARE CENTER
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 12669388 ↗InjurySep 16, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIP OF AN ASAHI PROWATER GUIDE WIRE HAD SEPARATED AND REMAINED IN THE PATIENT DURING BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY TO TREAT AN UNSPECIFIED LESION IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE WIRE WAS INSERTED IN THE RCA. AN UNSPECIFIED BALLOON WAS THEN ADVANCED OVER THE GUIDE WIRE, INFLATED, AND DEFLATED. WHEN THE BALLOON WAS BEING REMOVED, THE PHYSICIAN FELT RESISTANCE AND ADDED EXTRA PRESSURE TO PULL IT BACK. IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE WIRE WAS FRACTURED, AND THE DISTAL END OF WIRE WAS LEFT IN THE RCA. THE WIRE FRAGMENT WAS NOT MOVED AND AN ATTEMPT TO RETRIEVE IT WAS NOT MADE DUE TO CONTRAST AMOUNT. THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK TWO DAYS LATER. THE LESION WAS STENTED WITH THE WIRE FRAGMENT IN THE RCA TO THE ARTERIAL WALL WITH SUCCESS. THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL AND PATIENT IS DOING WELL.
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque
MAUDE report 12485720 ↗
Other Asahi Intecc CO., Ltd. products
All Asahi Intecc CO., Ltd. devices →Sources and updates
- Models: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026. Models are grouped by the brand name the manufacturer registered.
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page