Epix Laparoscopic Scissors CB040Recalls & reported problems
Applied Medical Resources Corporation · 5mm x 45cm Laparoscopic Scissors · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00607915110130), received between Mar 6, 2017 and Mar 1, 2022 — classified as 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Cut” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Cut5
- Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 1, 2022Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
NAME OF PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED: GASTRIC SLEEVE REVISION. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: CB040 BLADES WERE DULL AND WOULD NOT CUT DOWN ADHESIONS DURING USE IN A PROCEDURE. CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PAIR OF SCISSORS WITHOUT PROBLEM. NO PATIENT INJURY OCCURRED. PRODUCT IS AVAILABLE FOR RETURN. PATIENT STATUS: NO PATIENT INJURY OCCURRED. TYPE OF INTERVENTION: CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER PAIR OF SCISSORS WITHOUT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13641095 ↗MalfunctionJan 3, 2022Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
NAME OF PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED: LAP BAND REMOVAL. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE WAS NOT PRESENT DURING THE CASE WHEN 3 EA. UNITS OF CB040 WOULD NOT CUT DURING USE. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE SCISSORS FUNCTIONED PROPERLY WHEN TESTED OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT, BUT WHEN PLACED THROUGH THE TROCAR EACH UNIT OF SCISSORS WOULD NOT CUT. CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A CB030. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE MATERIALS MANAGER ALSO REPORTS THAT THEY ARE UNSURE IF INCREASED CALCIFICATION ON THE LAP BAND ATTRIBUTED TO THE SCISSORS NOT CUTTING. WHEN THE SCISSORS WERE EXAMINED AFTER THE CASE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BLADES HAD BURRS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL 10D-EC-2021 FROM [NAME], ACCOUNT MANAGER: IMAGE OF COMPLAINT DEVICE SHOWING BURR ON BLADES. REP STATES THAT ALL 3 UNITS HAVE THE BURR. CUSTOMER STATES THAT WHEN THE SCISSORS WERE TAKEN OUT OF THE PACKAGE, THEY WORKED. BUT ONCE THERE WERE IN THE PORT TO CUT THE BAND, THEY "LOCK UP." THIS HAPPENED WITH ALL 3 SCISSORS, AND EACH WERE TESTED BEFOREHAND. "THE SMALLER SCISSOR WORKED. I OPENED ANOTHER ONE AND IT WORKS OUT OF THE PACKAGE BUT WHEN ANY PRESSURE IS PUT ON THE SHAFT IT WONT WORK." PRODUCTS ARE AVAI
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13146270 ↗MalfunctionJan 3, 2022Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
NAME OF PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED: LAP BAND REMOVAL DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE WAS NOT PRESENT DURING THE CASE WHEN 3 EA. UNITS OF CB040 WOULD NOT CUT DURING USE. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE SCISSORS FUNCTIONED PROPERLY WHEN TESTED OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT, BUT WHEN PLACED THROUGH THE TROCAR EACH UNIT OF SCISSORS WOULD NOT CUT. CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A CB030. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE MATERIALS MANAGER ALSO REPORTS THAT THEY ARE UNSURE IF INCREASED CALCIFICATION ON THE LAP BAND ATTRIBUTED TO THE SCISSORS NOT CUTTING. WHEN THE SCISSORS WERE EXAMINED AFTER THE CASE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BLADES HAD BURRS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL 10DEC2021 FROM [NAME], ACCOUNT MANAGER: IMAGE OF COMPLAINT DEVICE ATTACHED SHOWING BURR ON BLADES. REP STATES THAT ALL 3 UNITS HAVE THE BURR. CUSTOMER STATES THAT WHEN THE SCISSORS WERE TAKEN OUT OF THE PACKAGE, THEY WORKED. BUT ONCE THERE WERE IN THE PORT TO CUT THE BAND, THEY "LOCK UP." THIS HAPPENED WITH ALL 3 SCISSORS, AND EACH WERE TESTED BEFOREHAND. "THE SMALLER SCISSOR WORKED. I OPENED ANOTHER ONE AND IT WORKS OUT OF THE PACKAGE BUT WHEN ANY PRESSURE IS PUT ON THE SHAFT IT WONT WORK." PRODUCTS AR
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13146267 ↗MalfunctionJan 3, 2022Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
NAME OF PROCEDURE BEING PERFORMED: LAP BAND REMOVAL. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE WAS NOT PRESENT DURING THE CASE WHEN 3 EA. UNITS OF CB040 WOULD NOT CUT DURING USE. IT IS REPORTED THAT THE SCISSORS FUNCTIONED PROPERLY WHEN TESTED OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT, BUT WHEN PLACED THROUGH THE TROCAR EACH UNIT OF SCISSORS WOULD NOT CUT. CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH A CB030. THERE WAS NO INJURY TO THE PATIENT. THE MATERIALS MANAGER ALSO REPORTS THAT THEY ARE UNSURE IF INCREASED CALCIFICATION ON THE LAP BAND ATTRIBUTED TO THE SCISSORS NOT CUTTING. WHEN THE SCISSORS WERE EXAMINED AFTER THE CASE, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE BLADES HAD BURRS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED VIA EMAIL 10DEC2021 FROM [NAME], ACCOUNT MANAGER: IMAGE OF COMPLAINT DEVICE ATTACHED SHOWING BURR ON BLADES. REP STATES THAT ALL 3 UNITS HAVE THE BURR. CUSTOMER STATES THAT WHEN THE SCISSORS WERE TAKEN OUT OF THE PACKAGE, THEY WORKED. BUT ONCE THERE WERE IN THE PORT TO CUT THE BAND, THEY "LOCK UP." THIS HAPPENED WITH ALL 3 SCISSORS, AND EACH WERE TESTED BEFOREHAND. "THE SMALLER SCISSOR WORKED. I OPENED ANOTHER ONE AND IT WORKS OUT OF THE PACKAGE BUT WHEN ANY PRESSURE IS PUT ON THE SHAFT IT WONT WORK." PRODUCTS A
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13146265 ↗MalfunctionSep 7, 2017Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
PROCEDURE PERFORMED: LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. EVENT DESCRIPTION: STAFF THOUGHT THAT THE PACKAGING HAD A HOLE IN IT, LOOKS LIKE IT WAS MELTED. THERE WAS NO RISK OR IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS COMPLAINT, THERE WAS NO DELAY TO CASE AND ANOTHER DEVICE WAS OPENED. THE PRODUCT IS USED WEEKLY; THE PRODUCT FOR RETURN IS NOT CONTAMINATED AND READY FOR COLLECTION BY THE REP. THE REP HAS NOTIFIED THE HOSPITAL OF THE "INDENTATION" AS BEING PART OF THE PACKAGING TO HOLD THE DEVICE UPRIGHT AND DOES NOT COMPROMISE STERILITY. TYPE OF INTERVENTION: ANOTHER DEVICE OPENED PATIENT STATUS: FINE
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6850630 ↗MalfunctionMar 6, 2017Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
ROUX-EN-Y - "BLADES WERE NOT CUTTING." PATIENT STATUS - "PATIENT IS GOOD."
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6380690 ↗
Other Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories) devices
- Olympus WA50042AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)1 recall6,135 reports
- Olympus WA50052AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)2,249 reports
- ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF-S190-5Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · LAPAROSCOPE, GYNECOLOGIC (AND ACCESSORIES)1 recall1,279 reports
- Olympus WA50040AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)1 recall954 reports
- Olympus WA50050AOLYMPUS Winter & Ibe GmbH · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)895 reports
- ENDOEYE FLEX DEFLECTABLE VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF-S190-5Olympus Medical Systems Corp. · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)624 reports
- Epix Laparoscopic Scissors CB030Applied Medical Resources Corporation · Laparoscope, Gynecologic (And Accessories)239 reports
- HD EndoEYE LAPARO-THORACO VIDEOSCOPE OLYMPUS LTF TYPE VHOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · LAPAROSCOPE, GYNECOLOGIC (AND ACCESSORIES)168 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page