Skip to content

RELIANCE 4-FRONT™ 0673Recalls & reported problems

Boston Scientific Corporation · Integrated Bipolar Pace/Sense and Defibrillation Lead · Class 3 · Implant

All models of RELIANCE 4-FRONT (11)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Quick summary

This Boston Scientific Reliance 4-Front defibrillator lead has 2,131 reports, which include 8 deaths and 1,614 injuries. Many describe infection, and some describe leads moving out of place, high electrical resistance and difficulty pacing the heart. No recalls name this device.

AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.

Adverse event reports
2,173
Deaths reported
10
Injuries reported
1,638
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2,173 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00802526592867), received between Nov 7, 2018 and Sep 30, 2026 — classified as 10 deaths, 1,638 injuries, 525 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “High impedance” (300 reports).

3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P910073); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 27 reportsDec 2023: 24 reportsJan 2024: 32 reportsFeb 2024: 32 reportsMar 2024: 26 reportsApr 2024: 33 reportsMay 2024: 27 reportsJun 2024: 34 reportsJul 2024: 32 reportsAug 2024: 26 reportsSep 2024: 26 reportsOct 2024: 32 reportsNov 2024: 53 reportsDec 2024: 33 reportsJan 2025: 36 reportsFeb 2025: 31 reportsMar 2025: 32 reportsApr 2025: 27 reportsMay 2025: 39 reportsJun 2025: 46 reportsJul 2025: 32 reportsAug 2025: 32 reportsSep 2025: 27 reportsOct 2025: 28 reportsNov 2025: 34 reportsDec 2025: 48 reportsJan 2026: 29 reportsFeb 2026: 38 reportsMar 2026: 48 reportsApr 2026: 36 reportsMay 2026: 40 reportsJun 2026: 32 reportsJul 2026: 26 reportsAug 2026: 36 reportsSep 2026: 36 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports20242025202653
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem932
  • High impedance300
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated297
  • High Capture Threshold267
  • Over-Sensing173
  • Failure to Capture148
  • Signal Artifact/Noise123
  • Defective Device122

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions896
  • Unspecified Infection835
  • Sepsis164
  • No Code Available128
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient56
  • Perforation48
  • Cardiac Perforation43
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient41

Recent adverse event reports

The 25 most recent of 2,173 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • DeathSep 30, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    It was reported that the patient passed away on (B)(6) 2026. During a routine cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) system implant, the patient experienced cardiac arrest. The cardiac arrest occurred while the left ventricular (LV) lead was being implanted and after this right ventricular (RV) lead was implanted. Backup pacing was provided on this RV lead. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was given to the patient, and the patient experienced ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) several times. The field representative noted the patient was stable after the procedure. It was later reported by the field representative that the patient passed away overnight. It was noted the CRT-D was never implanted in the patient. This RV lead was an attempted implant. No additional adverse patient effects were reported.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Tachycardia; Ventricular Fibrillation

    MAUDE report 50950618 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2026Low impedance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50949563 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 30, 2026High impedance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50947730 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2026High impedance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50936104 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50923938 ↗
  • InjurySep 28, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50919971 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026Over-Sensing

    Patient problems: Asystole

    MAUDE report 50915187 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 28, 2026High impedance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50914163 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2026Insufficient Device Problem Information

    It was reported that this right ventricular (RV) lead was explanted due to a product performance anomaly. No additional adverse patient effects were reported.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50899775 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    It was reported that this right ventricular (RV) lead was part of a system revision due to infection. The patient was treated with antibiotics. There were no additional adverse patient effects reported. The RV lead was explanted.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50895843 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2026Low impedance

    It was reported that this right ventricular (RV) lead exhibited low out of range shock impedance measurements. Technical Services (TS) was consulted and found the value to be 0 ohms. TS discussed with the local field representative that this is unlikely true and an external source caused the out of range value. If no external source is found to be the root cause, TS recommended in person evaluation of the lead. No adverse patient effects were reported. This RV lead remains in service.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50882948 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 24, 2026High impedance

    It was reported that this right ventricular (RV) lead exhibited rising pace impedances since (b)(6) 2025. Pace impedance measurements had increased from 650 Ohms at implant to a high out-of-range pace impedance measurement of 2,010 Ohms. Shock impedances remained stable since implant, with measurements in the 80-100 Ohms range. Technical Services (TS) discussed troubleshooting options, programming considerations, and possible causes. This RV lead remains in service. No adverse patient effects were reported.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50877123 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026High impedance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50876107 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 23, 2026High impedance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50876057 ↗
  • DeathSep 17, 2026Failure to Convert Rhythm; Failure to Read Input Signal; Under-Sensing

    It was reported that during a device upgrade procedure, defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed but was unsuccessful as the right ventricular (RV) defibrillation lead could not detect and convert. The paced QRS was 2.5mV, the induced VF was not detected and an external shock was delivered to convert the arrhythmia. The RV lead was repositioned, sensitivity was adjusted and the paced QRS was now 4.2mV. DFTs failed at 21 Joules and 31 Joules in the initial polarity, then was successful at 31 Joules in reversed polarity. In total, 11 DFTs were performed. The patient passed away over the weekend; there were no allegations against the implanted device but the physician was looking to see if any episode EGMs were available. Technical services discussed there was no LATITUDE data and recommended interrogating the device post-mortem. It was noted that the patient had undergone a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) one week before. Additional information was received confirming the device was not interrogated post-mortem and the device and lead were not explanted for return. The official cause of death was not provided to the local sales representative and the physician did not

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 50809993 ↗
  • InjurySep 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    It was reported that this implantable lead was part of the system revision due to infection. No adverse patient effects were reported. The implantable lead was explanted.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50783384 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Insufficient Device Problem Information; High Capture Threshold

    It was reported that this right ventricular (RV) lead was explanted due to an unknown product anomaly. A new lead was implanted. No additional adverse patient effects were reported. This RV lead remains in service.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50754169 ↗
  • InjurySep 11, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50739624 ↗
  • InjurySep 9, 2026Signal Artifact/Noise; Fracture; High impedance; Mechanical Problem; Over-Sensing; Pacing Problem; Difficult to Remove

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50702989 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 9, 2026High impedance

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50698553 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50678105 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    It was reported that this right ventricular (RV) lead was part of a system revision due to infection. There were no additional adverse patient effects reported. This RV lead was explanted.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50677337 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2026High Capture Threshold

    It was reported that this right ventricular (RV) lead exhibited elevated threshold measurements and outputs were above 6. volts. The device had 1.5 years remaining at the elevated outputs. This RV lead was surgically revised and remains in service. No additional adverse patient effects were reported.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50668687 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50652982 ↗
  • InjurySep 7, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Patient problems: Erosion; Purulent Discharge; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50652278 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P910073. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2327-2025 · Jul 24, 2025 · Open, Classified
    RELIANCE 4-FRONT, endocardial cardioversion/defibrillation and pace/sense lead, Permanent Defibrillator Electrodes; Model Nos. 0654, 0655, 0657, 0658, 0682, 0683, 0685, 0686, 0692,
  • Z-2326-2025 · Jul 24, 2025 · Open, Classified
    ENDOTAK RELIANCE G/SG with 4-SITE Connector, transvenous defibrillation lead, Permanent Defibrillator Electrodes; Model Nos. 0282, 0283, 0285, 0286, 0292, 0293, 0295, 0296
  • Z-2325-2025 · Jul 24, 2025 · Open, Classified
    ENDOTAK RELIANCE G/SG, transvenous defibrillation lead, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (non-CRT); Model Nos. 0160, 0161, 0162, 0163, 0164, 0165, 0166, 0167, 0170, 0171, o18

Other Permanent defibrillator electrodes devices

All Permanent defibrillator electrodes devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page