Skip to content

InHealth Technologies; Blom-Singer; Classic IN 1606-NSRecalls & reported problems

Freudenberg Medical, LLC · Class 2

All models of InHealth Technologies; Blom-Singer; Classic (4)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00813307011071), received between Sep 8, 2025 and Sep 8, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Airway Obstruction1
  • Aspiration/Inhalation1
  • Choking1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 8, 2025Difficult to Insert; Migration; Difficult to Insert; Migration

    INCIDENT DESCRIPTION: " A 67-YEAR-OLD PATIENT WITH A TRACHEOSTOMY AND A VOICE PROSTHESIS FOLLOWING A TOTAL LARYNGECTOMY FOR RECURRENT INVASIVE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE RIGHT GLOTTIC CAVITY EXPERIENCED A COMPLICATION DURING IMPLANT REPLACEMENT ON (B)(6). THE REPLACEMENT ATTEMPT FAILED, AND DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE VOICE IMPLANT FLANGE WAS ASPIRATED. A SHILEY 8 TRACHEOSTOMY TUBE WITH AN INFLATED CUFF WAS INSERTED SUBSEQUENTLY." PATIENT IMPACT: " THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED CHOKING DURING THE INCIDENT. THERE WAS NO BUZZER IN THE CUBICLE, AND THE SURGEON HAD TO CALL FOR HELP VOCALLY. THE FLANGE WAS NOT VISUALIZED IN THE ESOPHAGUS DURING ENDOSCOPY. AN ATTEMPT TO INSERT A LONGER 8 MM IMPLANT FAILED, AS THE FLANGE COULD NOT BE DEPLOYED. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REPLACEMENT SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA WITH A 10 MM BLOM-SINGER IMPLANT ON (B)(6) AND WAS DISCHARGED WITHOUT FURTHER COMPLICATIONS ON (B)(6). NO RETAINED EVIDENCE WAS KEPT BY THE FACILITY."

    Patient problems: Airway Obstruction; Aspiration/Inhalation; Choking; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22991909 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Laryngeal (Taub) devices

All Prosthesis, Laryngeal (Taub) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page