Arndt G26907Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Arndt Endobronchial Blocker Set With Spherical Balloon · Class 2
All models of Arndt (8)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002269071), received between Mar 10, 2017 and Nov 10, 2017 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Air Leak” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Air Leak1
- Break1
- Component Missing1
- Decrease in Pressure1
- Deflation Problem1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 10, 2017Break; Component Missing; Break; Component Missing
PRIOR TO THE OPENING OF THE PACKAGE, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE TIP OF THE SYRINGE IN THE ARNDT ENDOBRONCHIAL BLOCKER SET WAS "BROKEN AND MISSING" (SIC). THE PRODUCT ISSUE WAS DISCOVERED PRIOR TO USE; ACCORDINGLY, NO PATIENT ADVERSE EVENTS RESULTED FROM THE PRODUCT MALFUNCTION. THE PRODUCT WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION; HOWEVER, AS OF THE DATE OF THIS REPORT THE INVESTIGATION IS STILL PENDING.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7017955 ↗MalfunctionOct 24, 2017Air Leak; Decrease in Pressure; Air Leak; Decrease in Pressure
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE BALLOON PORTION OF AN ARNDT ENDOBRONCHIAL BLOCKER SET WOULD NOT REMAIN INFLATED WHEN USED IN THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH BLEEDING IN THE LOWER RIGHT LUNG, SO THE OPERATOR ELECTED TO PLACE THE BLOCKER IN THE RIGHT MAIN STEM. THE BALLOON WAS THEN INFLATED TO BETWEEN 5 AND 6 CC'S OF AIR. THE ADAPTOR WAS THEN SCREWED DOWN, AND RENDERED IMMOVABLE. HOWEVER, UPON THE RESCOPING OF THE PATIENT THE FOLLOWING DAY, THE BALLOON WAS OBSERVED TO BE COMPLETELY DEFLATED. THE BALLOON WAS THEN RE-INFLATED AND SCREWED INTO PLACE ONCE MORE - THIS TIME WITH 7 CC'S OF AIR; BUT, 8 HOURS LATER, THE BALLOON WAS AGAIN FOUND TO BE DEFLATED. THE BLEEDING FINALLY CEASED FOLLOWING NUMEROUS BRONCHOSCOPIES USING COLD SALINE FLUSHES. THE PATIENT HAD EMPHYSEMA, AND WAS ON BLOOD THINNERS. THE PRODUCT IS REPORTEDLY UNAVAILABLE FOR RETURN.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6972720 ↗InjuryMar 10, 2017Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem
INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT A (B)(6) PATIENT UNDERWENT A THORACOSCOPY FOR A CHEST WALL TUMOR BIOPSY. AN ARNDT ENDOBRONCHIAL BLOCKER SET WAS EMPLOYED TO FOR ANESTHESIA MANAGEMENT DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS TESTED FOR LEAKS PRIOR TO USE THEN INSERTED INTO ONE LUNG AND INFLATED. THE CONDITIONS, MANIPULATIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE INITIAL TESTING OF THE DEVICE ARE NOT KNOWN. THE BALLOON DEFLATED AT AN UNSPECIFIED TIME DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND A NEW DEVICE USED. THE EVENT RESULTED IN AN EXTENSION OF THE PROCEDURE AND ANESTHESIA TIME. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. NO FURTHER PATIENT OR DEVICE EVENTS WERE REPORTED. POST REMOVAL EXAMINATION OF THE DEVICE BY THE USER REVEALED A LEAK AT THE JUNCTION OF THE PILOT BALLOON ASSEMBLY TUBE AND THE BLUE WING SHAPED COMPONENT. THE USER COMMENTED THAT IT WAS DIFFICULT TO ASSESS THE LEAKAGE BECAUSE THE AMOUNT OF LEAKAGE WAS DEPENDENT UPON THE ORIENTATION OF THE DEVICE; ONE ORIENTATION ALLOWED FOR A SLOW LEAK WHICH MAINTAINED BALLOON INFLATION AND ANOTHER ORIENTATION ALLOWED FOR A RAPID LEAK AND SUBSEQUENT DEFLATION OF THE BALLOON. THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) STATE IN THE
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6396866 ↗
Other TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR) devices
- HUDSON RCI IPN048996Teleflex Incorporated · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)64 reports
- VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 37 Fr - LEFT 412371000Ambu A/S · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)1 recall10 reports
- HUDSON RCI IPN048995Teleflex Incorporated · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)58 reports
- VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 39 Fr - LEFT 412391000Ambu A/S · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)1 recall6 reports
- VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 35 Fr - LEFT 412351000Ambu A/S · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)1 recall2 reports
- VivaSight™ 2 DLT Kit 41 Fr - LEFT 412411000Ambu A/S · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)1 recall2 reports
- Portex 198-35LIcu Medical, Inc. · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)48 reports
- Portex 198-37LIcu Medical, Inc. · TUBE, TRACHEAL/BRONCHIAL, DIFFERENTIAL VENTILATION (W/WO CONNECTOR)44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page